Donors and Afghan officials are meeting in Geneva for a key summit that could determine Afghanistan’s fiscal future, as aid groups warn of funding cuts and soaring humanitarian needs.
The 23-24 November pledging conference, which is largely online, comes at a pivotal moment for aid-dependent Afghanistan. The country faces a second wave of COVID-19, warnings of widespread hunger in the coming winter months, political turmoil on home soil and abroad, and rising conflict violence – including a barrage of rockets that killed at least eight people and injured dozens in the capital, Kabul, on Saturday.
Here are some key issues:
Money: Funding pitfalls
Afghanistan’s pledging conferences take place every four years, but “donor fatigue” and a global aid system stretched by the coronavirus pandemic could see financial commitments fall short.
Afghanistan’s largest donor, the United States, has indicated it could make substantial cuts. Other major donors are stressing conditions to their contributions – some of which appear to be partially beyond the current government’s control, such as ensuring aid access and “a permanent and comprehensive ceasefire”. The government’s peace talks with the Taliban are underway, but violence continues.
“Now is not the time for international donors to be scaling down or stepping back,” Omar Waraich, Amnesty International’s head in South Asia, said in a statement.
Afghanistan depends on donors to fund at least half its annual budget, and this is unlikely to change for the foreseeable future. The World Bank projects the economy could contract by between 5.5 and 7.4 percent this year due to the coronavirus – sending poverty rates soaring and squeezing the budget further.
In a March analysis, the United States Institute of Peace called funding a “critical ingredient” for Afghanistan’s stability: “Not having a strong public finance foundation might well undercut the government’s credibility, as well as reducing its capability to govern and manage its activities during what is sure to be a long, hard peace process.”
Politics: Peace talks and troop withdrawals
There’s political uncertainty within Afghanistan and on the world stage, which drives volatility on the battlefield.
Taliban peace talks started in September, but conflict continues to simmer, including ongoing fighting that shuttered health clinics and displaced 35,000 civilians in the Taliban southern heartland in Helmand Province in October, and reportedly 16,000 in Kandahar.
As the Taliban ramps up its first major offensive since the peace talks began, US President Donald Trump has said he will accelerate troop withdrawals – beyond levels agreed to in February’s US-Taliban agreement, which paved the way for the current Afghan-led negotiations.
Civil society: A greater role for women
Rights groups and humanitarian organisations say civil society must have a clear role in Afghanistan’s future, and in any agreements to come out of Geneva this week.
This is particularly important for local women’s groups working on peace and development. A statement by groups including the Kabul-based Equality for Peace and Democracy, which is scheduled to address this week’s conference, said more women need to be at the negotiating table.
“Peace cannot come at the cost of women’s rights and peace will not be successful if women are ignored in this conversation,” the groups said.
There are four women on Afghanistan’s 21-member peace negotiating team, but aid group CARE said women and girls are essentially “excluded from meaningful participation” in the peace process. CARE is calling on donors to make women’s participation in negotiations “a requirement for any future financial assistance”.
“Peace cannot come at the cost of women’s rights and peace will not be successful if women are ignored in this conversation.”
There are fears that funding shortfalls could eat away at humanitarian programmes for people displaced by conflict and disasters. This year, nearly one million Afghans were displaced or forced to return from abroad.
NGOs provide the bulk of humanitarian aid and supplement basic health services, especially in areas the government doesn’t control. Local aid workers and subcontracted local NGOs in particular say bare-bones funding already forces them to take on greater risks.
The immediate future: Humanitarian worries
This week’s summit aims to raise cash pledges for the next four years, but humanitarian concerns are building now.
“Many people have exhausted their savings and supplies. Their overriding concern is now surviving the meagre winter months,” said Thomas ten Boer, who heads German NGO Welthungerhilfe in Afghanistan.
Conflict, climate, and disasters are compounding the food insecurity. The La Niña weather phenomenon could bring hotter, drier conditions to Afghanistan. The last severe drought in 2018 displaced more people than the war, and tens of thousands who fled then still haven’t returned home.
It was The New Humanitarian’s investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation that uncovered sexual abuse by aid workers during the Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of Congo and led the World Health Organization to launch an independent review and reform its practices.
This demonstrates the important impact that our journalism can have.
But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking.
We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.
The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and shine a light on similar abuses.