South Sudan’s warring parties agreed to form a long-delayed unity government last week – a major step forward to ending six years of conflict that left an estimated 400,000 people dead in the world’s youngest nation.
Rebel leader Riek Machar was appointed first vice president – having previously held the job in 2016 and 2013 – by President Salva Kiir, who said peace in the country was now “irreversible”.
Machar and Kiir first signed a power-sharing deal in September 2018 but were unable to finalise negotiations and missed two previous deadlines – May 2019 and November 2019.
Previous attempts at forging peace in South Sudan have all failed – most notably in 2016, when Machar fled the capital, Juba, under a hail of bullets just weeks after being sworn in as vice president.
The current deal still has plenty of sticking points to navigate, from the formation of an 83,000-strong unified army, to the question of Machar’s personal protection and the internal boundaries of the state.
But both sides made considerable compromises to reach this point – a sign, according to the International Crisis Group, that they are “more willing participants in this unity government than in the last failed one”.
As hopes are raised, here are some key TNH stories from years of on-the-ground reporting.
A unity government has been formed but questions remain over how tens of millions of dollars pledged by the government to implement the peace deal have been spent.
Putting a deal in place wasn’t easy and there are still plenty of issues to navigate in the months ahead.
Violence has reduced but the humanitarian picture remains bleak, with devastating floods last year affecting around one million people.
Decades of war have left almost half the population with post-traumatic stress symptoms and little mental health care.
Violence between government forces and parties who refused to accept the peace agreement escalated last year. The spoilers could strike again.
A special multimedia report on how the once peaceful region of Equatoria became South Sudan’s main theatre of war.
We uncovered the sex abuse scandal that rocked the WHO, but there’s more to do
We just covered a report that says the World Health Organization failed to prevent and tackle widespread sexual abuse during the Ebola response in Congo.
Our investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation triggered this probe, demonstrating the impact our journalism can have.
But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking.
We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.
The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and do more of this.