The flag of Kurdistan is draped over the walls of public buildings in Afrin in northern Syria: After the security forces left the small town near the Turkish border two weeks ago, the Syrian banners have all but disappeared.
Instead, new colours have been raised, not only the Kurdish national colours, but also those of the Democratic Union Party (PYD), the Syrian wing of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), deemed a “terrorist” organization by many countries because of its bloody fight for separation or at least autonomy from Turkey for 30 years.
“Now, the PYD controls everything,” said Chomerd Hawari*, who runs a small human rights organization in Afrin. “They have set up checkpoints, and their armed people are patrolling the streets. They have taken positions in the market, the central squares and in front of the bus station.”
Afrin is not the only town which has been effectively taken over by Kurdish militia after the regular Syrian troops pulled out, Syrian and Kurdish activists say. The same has been reported in Kobani, also in Aleppo Province, as well as in Amude and Deirik in eastern Syria.
The Kurds, roughly 10 percent of the population, have long stayed on the sidelines of the Syrian uprising, with the Kurdistan region of Syria remaining relatively peaceful. But now, with the PYD asserting its power in the north, the minority group risks getting caught up in conflict, as foreign interests intersect with local rivalries.
Domiz refugee camp, in the semi-autonomous Kurdish region of northern Iraq, some 60km from the Syrian border, is home to nearly 2,500 Kurdish Syrians who have fled the violence in Syria in the past few months. (Thousands of others have settled outside the camp in other parts of Iraqi Kurdistan). Nearly one-quarter of the camp’s residents are young single men.
One aid worker visiting the camp said he saw military buses just outside the tent area for young single men; and noticed their physiques had changed in the months since they arrived - “it was clear they had received some form of rough training.”
During a recent IRIN visit, rowdy youth wearing underwear and tracksuit bottoms complained of the excruciating heat and lack of job opportunities. At first, they were reluctant to admit to any training, some trying to silence others willing to speak.
But after some discussion, one youth told IRIN: “We are receiving training to defend our land in Syria in case we have to go back.”
“When the regime falls,” another insisted.
“No, tomorrow!” the first youth said.
“We’re taking this training to go back and fight Assad,” a third interjected.
These are among hundreds of Syrian Kurds that have been receiving military training from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) of Iraq since the beginning of the conflict in Syria, “so that they can play a role,” according to Minister Falah Mustafa, head of the KRG’s department of foreign relations.
“After the collapse of the regime, when there is a security vacuum, everybody is armed and will come and violate their rights,” he told IRIN. “All the other groups have forces and capacities. The Kurds are the only ones who do not have this. ”
Kurds versus Kurds
Estimates of the numbers trained range from 600 to 2,000, but Cale Salih, an analyst with the International Crisis Group (ICG), told IRIN about 650 appear to be ready to return to Syria to fight.
The aid worker at Domiz said some youth had left the refugee camp after receiving some training, suggesting they may have returned to Syria to fight.
But fight whom?
Mustafa, the KRG minister, said the training was purely defensive, “so that the Kurds will also have some people to defend them in their area… These are not for offence purposes.”
Analysts say it is part of an attempt by KRG President Masoud Barzani to extend his influence in Syria, but could also create divisions: Once armed, these Barzani-loyal Kurds could clash with forces of the PYD, until now, the only armed Kurdish group.
The PKK’s struggle with Turkey has put it at odds with Barzani, who has cultivated his ties with Turkey, one of KRG’s main trading partners.
According to Kurdish sources, the training was coordinated with the Kurdish National Council (KNC) - a new Kurdish umbrella group, created in the wake of the Syrian uprising and based in the Kurdish Syrian town of Qamishli. KNC’s close ties with Barzani and its move towards militarization are likely to exacerbate its rivalry with the PYD. Analysts say Barzani’s target in training these forces was not Assad, but the PYD.
“The PYD does not want to let the Peshmerga [the pro-Kurdistan regional government fighters] from Iraq back into [Syria]. They worry about Kurdish-Kurdish clashes,” said Pablo*, a youth activist in the Kurdish town of Qamishli, along the Turkish border. “So they are stuck on the Iraqi side of the border until now.”
Risk of conflict
“The Kurds are being torn apart by the conflicting interests of Turkey, Iraq and Syria,” says Adam, an activist in the northeastern Syrian town of Hassake, also home to a large Kurdish population. “This is helping the regime to turn the Kurdish issue into the weak link of the revolution.”
Kurdish residents take over the abandoned police station in the Kurdish city of Amude, northeastern Syria, after Syrian security forces withdrew from the city in July 2012
But until now, the Kurds have not firmly positioned themselves as part of the so-called revolution. Indeed, they could end up fighting against other opposition forces for control of territory.
Take the strategic town of Qamishli, rich in oil and gas reserves, and in symbolism: it was home to a brutal crackdown by the regime in 2004. The PYD has traditionally been weaker in Qamishli, where analysts say all parties - the PYD; the Kurds who support Barzani and the KNC; the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA); and the Syrian government - could end up vying for power.
“There is a clear risk of conflict,” said Salih of ICG. “Qamishli is not a city that will be given up easily to anybody.”
And while the Kurdish fight may seem like a side show, what happens in Syrian Kurdistan is “extremely decisive” for the future of Syria in the scenario of a civil war, Salih said, because it will determine the positions of Turkey and of Iraqi Kurdistan in those areas, and will determine the future of the PKK movement as a whole.
Road to power
The so-called Kurdish uprising is not yet well-understood, with conflicting explanations as to how the PYD came to control parts of northeastern Syria.
Sometime after the Syrian uprising in March 2011, the Syrian government allowed the PYD to return hundreds, possibly thousands of its members - estimates range from 1,000 to 2,000 - to Syria from its headquarters in the Qandil mountains, along the Iraq-Iran border. The PYD slowly began taking control of some areas of Syrian Kurdistan, setting up checkpoints and municipal councils - known as the People’s Council of Western Kurdistan (PCWK) - without too much interference by the government.
Opposition figures have long accused the party of acting as enforcers of the regime, suppressing protests and intimidating dissidents. “Some young activists have tried to stage demonstrations in recent months, but they were attacked every time. PYD militia shot into the air and beat up protesters”, says Hawari, the human rights activist. “Some activists were even kidnapped and tortured with electric shocks.”
In July, PYD control was solidified. Some say the regime practically handed over the towns to the PYD. Others say it was given a deadline to leave by the PYD, and did not have the means to fight back.
“The military pulled out because of what happened in Damascus und Aleppo,” says Barzan Iso, a Turkey-based member of the PCWK, which includes the PYD and other Kurdish political parties. “When the fighting in the two big cities started, they moved their troops and left places like Afrin and Kobani since they are not strategically important.”
The PYD’s popularity
Activists like Iso welcome the takeover as “liberation” from decades of deprivation of many basic civil rights by Damascus.
But for now, the PYD’s resurgence remains young and its popularity hard to gauge, especially as other new umbrella groups like the KNC enter the fray. What appears certain is that the PYD is eager to fill the power vacuum left by the state.
But the party does not rely only on military power to increase its influence, according to Siamend Hajo, of the website Kurdwatch in Berlin, which tracks human rights violations against the Syrian Kurds.
“They have managed to organize themselves. They are maintaining law and order; they are administering justice; and keeping all the institutions running,” Hajo told IRIN. “Now people don’t call the police any more if there is a crime. They call the PYD.”
After decades of cultural repression, the PYD - with some degree of allowance by the government - has opened schools teaching the Kurdish language, and cultural centres have mushroomed in the region.
“Many Kurdish nationalists don’t have a problem with what is happening because now Kurds are ruling Kurds,” Hajo said. “But at the same time, one dictatorship is replaced by another.”
Its own agenda
In recent months, observers say, the PYD’s relationship with the Syrian government began to change. While there might have been an alliance between them in the early stages of the revolt, the PYD has now “seen the writing on the wall”, breaking off the presumed cooperation and pursuing its own agenda instead.
While independent protests have hardly taken place in PYD-strongholds like Kobani, Amude and Deirik in recent weeks, amateur footage on the internet shows PYD rallies, with crowds chanting anti-regime slogans.
According to Salih, PYD and regime security forces have also clashed.
“[The PYD] is an impressively disciplined and effective group, but totally committed to its own agenda, and absolutely ruthless in carrying it out, ” writes Aron Lund, author of a detailed report on the Syrian opposition.
Nor is the Kurdish leadership convinced that jumping in bed with the Syrian opposition is in their best interests. Many Kurds suspect the rebels do not respect the rights of the Kurds any more than the Syrian regime.
“There is a kind of separation between the Kurdish and the Arab areas,” said Sarhat*, an activist in Kobani. “We’re worried that they will not grant us our rights in the end. This is why we prefer to fight for ourselves.”
For the Kurds, their own rights come first, before any discussion of democracy or transition. For KRG’s Mustafa, it is important the Kurds position themselves now - before the fall of the regime.
“For us, it’s important to see who will deliver,” he said. [The Syrian Kurds] have to be working on their own future within Syria.”
Recently the structures of an autonomous Kurdish region in northern Syria seemed to be starting to take shape.
A regional Kurdish government was formed in Qamishli, and a local parliament elected. Two weeks ago, KRG brokered an agreement between the KNC and PYD to cooperate, raising hopes that conflict could be overcome.
But the Kurds remain divided. And too close a relationship with the PYD would put Barzani, a Turkish ally and KNC supporter, in an awkward position.
“I was really happy about this agreement,” said Bahoz*, a local activist in Qamishli. “But in reality, nothing has changed. The parties are still not working together.”
Formally, all Kurdish armed groups are part of the “People’s Defence Unit” (YPG) which is supposed to answer to the KNC as well as the PCWK. But, most fighters are PYD members, and Kurdish activists say its military superiority allows it to marginalize other political parties.
A unit of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) - the Syrian offshoot of the PKK - which now controls the northeastern Syrian city of Kobani, after Syrian security forces pulled out. This is seen as the first time the Kurds are playing an active role in the up
In cities like Qamishli and Hassake, where the PYD is less popular and the Syrian security forces are still present, each Kurdish faction organizes its own weekly rally.
“At first, we tried to stage one big demonstration together,” Bohaz told IRIN, “but then conflicts came up, about which banners and slogans we should use. So we decided to keep our protests separate.”
If it comes down to a power struggle, analysts say the PYD is likely to win.
“Funding or support from northern Iraq may help other factions preserve some leverage vis-à-vis the PYD, but I can’t see that it would tip the scales,” Lund says.
But regional players are not likely to stand on the sidelines.
“We will not follow the situation blind-folded,” Mustafa of KRG said.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said last week that PKK activity in Syria could give Turkey grounds for intervention. The PKK earlier threated to turn the whole cross-border Kurdistan region into a “warzone” if Turkey intervened in Syria.
Until now, the PYD’s control has been largely unchecked because they are virtually the only armed group on the ground, as the Kurds have managed to keep the FSA out of the region. Small Kurdish battalions in the FSA - there are only one or two - are reportedly trying to stay out of the PYD’s way.
While some Kurdish activists fear that the return of the fighters from Iraq will trigger internal fighting, others hope they will help create more of an equilibrium.
“I think they should come and protect people - from the regime and from the PYD,” said Bahoz, the activist in Qamishli. “I don’t want the FSA to interfere in our area because they might drag us into the Syrian civil war. We’d prefer to have our own Kurdish army, and the people who were trained in Iraq could lay the foundation for that - although, if the parties still don’t find ways to cooperate, this could also lead to war between brothers.”
As Denise Natali, a fellow at the Washington-based National Defence University sees it: “There’s no clarity here. It’s grey as a mess. The [Kurds] go day by day. They don’t have strategic plans,” she told IRIN. “Kurds are taking advantage of the political vacuum, in the same way everyone else is.”
*not a real name
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions
It was The New Humanitarian’s investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation that uncovered sexual abuse by aid workers during the Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of Congo and led the World Health Organization to launch an independent review and reform its practices.
This demonstrates the important impact that our journalism can have.
But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking.
We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.
The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and shine a light on similar abuses.