1. Home
  2. Africa

"Worrying" drop in global spending

Cash - for generic use Nic McPhee/Flickr
Un indice solide doit être mis au point pour mesurer la qualité de l’aide apportée par les bailleurs, estiment les analystes
nternational funding for HIV fell by 10 percent in 2010 from the previous year, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation and UNAIDS; activists worry that a continued reduction will undermine progress in global HIV prevention and treatment efforts.

In their annual report on international assistance for HIV/AIDS in low- and middle- income countries, the two organizations report that funding fell from US$7.6 billion in 2009 to $6.9 billion in 2010. This is the first time funding has dropped in more than a decade of tracking HIV/AIDS spending; between 2002 and 2008, spending rose more than six-fold before levelling off in 2009.

"The slowdown in spending is worrying because it comes at a time when treatment as prevention has been proposed to curb HIV infections, which will require heavy investment," said James Kamau, coordinator of the Kenya Treatment Access Movement.

The report's authors attribute the drop to reductions in development assistance, currency exchange fluctuations and a slowdown in the pace of disbursements from the US government. Seven of 15 governments surveyed - Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the US - reported a year-on-year drop in their disbursements as measured in their own currencies.

"The US experienced a slower rate of disbursement in 2010 compared to the prior year, from $4.4 billion in 2009 to $3.7 billion in 2010, despite US enacted levels holding steady," the report states. "The slowdown occurred as a result of additional requirements put in place by Congress in 2008 during reauthorization of the PEPFAR [the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief]."

A graph depicting global AIDS spending since 2005
Photo: IRIN
Despite the slower pace in spending, the US remained the largest donor in the world, accounting for an estimated 54.2 percent of disbursements by governments, followed by the UK at 13 percent, France at 5.8 percent and the Netherlands at 5.1 percent. Germany and Denmark contributed 4.5 percent and 2.5 percent respectively. 

"We recognize that the US is experiencing economic difficulties and so are other major donors; Japan, for instance, was a major donor to the Global Fund [to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria] but has had a major natural disaster so needs to divert funds there," Kamau added. "It is therefore time to get our own governments moving to fund their epidemics...PEPFAR is an emergency plan, and not intended to last for ever."

Kamau stressed that African governments needed to abide by the 2001 Abuja Declaration, whereby they committed to spend at least 15 percent of their national budgets on health.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.