1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. East Africa
  4. Rwanda

Jury still out on effectiveness of `Gacaca’ courts

[Rwanda] Judges at a Gacaca court in Rwimbogo, 20 km east of Kigali, Rwanda, August 2005. The Gacaca courts are an indigenous tribunal of justice inspired by the country’s tradition and established in 2001, in the wake of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, when
Justice in action: A gacaca court near Kigali (IRIN)

Rwanda’s traditional `Gacaca’ courts, set up in 2001 to try some of those responsible for the 1994 genocide and to decongest the prison system, wind up on 30 June, but questions remain as to how much they achieved.

Gacaca courts have tried at least 1.5 million cases (with about 4,000 pending). However, at least 100 genocide survivors, have been killed - most of them after testifying against suspects in these courts, according to the umbrella organization for survivors, IBUKA.

"Most [survivors] who have testified in these courts are traumatized because genocide suspects and convicts single them out for revenge," said Theodore Simburudari, president of IBUKA.

Gacaca means “grass”, and trials are designed to take place in the open, where survivors point to suspects. This makes them vulnerable to reprisal attacks, Simburudari added.

Busingye Deus, a small-scale trader in Kigali, told IRIN that his friend, Ramadan Uzabukiriho, died in March in suspicious circumstances. Uzabukiriho, a genocide survivor whose parents died in 1994, was killed shortly after testifying in one of the courts.

"I am sure he would still be alive if he had not testified," Busingye said. Uzabukiriho's attacker is awaiting trial, according to IBUKA.

Attacks targeting suspected `genocidaires’ have also been recorded, and rights groups warn this could fuel ethnic tension.

In one incident reported by the New York-based Human Rights Watch, genocide survivor Frederic Murasira was killed near Mugatwa in eastern Rwanda. Hours after the attack, genocide survivors in a nearby village killed eight Mugatwa residents who had apparently played no role in Murasira's murder.

On the plus side, according to legal experts, the courts have managed to extract the truth from prisoners, enabling survivors to know exactly what happened to their loved ones.

Pending cases

Rwanda’s National Commission for the Fight Against Genocide is compiling data to highlight the system's achievements, said Kanimba Misango, the commission's president. Pending cases will revert to the conventional courts.

"Courts with outstanding cases will be given up to the end of the year to wind them up, otherwise, most of them close at the end of this month," Misango told IRIN.

Aid organizations have hailed the Gacaca system for reducing prison congestion through non-custodial sentences. The government has also so far released over 1,400 prisoners, requiring that they do community work instead of being locked up.

Despite its success in speeding up trials, the lack of legal representation and formally-trained judges has been pointed out as a weakness of the system.

“Lack of legal representation denies defendants a fair trial, [and] as legal practitioners, we should have addressed these gaps when the system was being introduced," a Kigali-based lawyer, who declined to be named, told IRIN, adding: "However, we have to also accept that at that time, there was a gross shortage of resources, both financial and physical."

[Rwanda] Billboard in Kigali calls people to take part in the Gacaca courts. "If you tell the truth you can be forgiven or the punishment is reduced."

Une affiche à Kiagli invitant la population à participer aux juridictions Gacaca. "Si vous avouez vos crimes vous serez pardonnés ou bénéficierez d'une réduction de peine...
[Rwanda] Billboard in Kigali calls people to take part in the Gacaca courts. "If you tell the truth you can be forgiven or the punishment is reduced."...
Tuesday, December 3, 2002
Les auteurs présumés de génocide sommés d'avouer leurs crimes d’ici mars...
[Rwanda] Billboard in Kigali calls people to take part in the Gacaca courts. "If you tell the truth you can be forgiven or the punishment is reduced."...

Photo: IRIN
A billboard in Kigali urging people to take part in Gacaca: The courts have tried at least 1.5 million cases, with about 4,000 pending - file photo


In 2008, HRW expressed concern that the system denied defendants the opportunity to a professional defence. It has also in the past pointed out numerous instances of faulty procedure, judicial corruption and false accusations, something which undermines trust in the system's jurisdiction.

The Gacaca courts have tried cases involving rapists, those who killed or intended to kill and their accomplices, as well as torture, incitement and property-related cases, while high level leaders and genocide organizers are tried in conventional courts.

Legal experts also say that instead of reconciling people - one of the courts' mandates - most genocide convicts reject reconciliation and restorative justice and resort to a retributive approach, a position echoed by IBUKA.

Also, it has been difficult for sexual violence survivors to testify as there were no provisions for in-camera proceedings, meaning such crimes often went unreported.

Each year the government dedicates a week to commemorate genocide victims, but in the past few years the week has seen an increasing number of attacks on individual survivors, according to the police.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article
Join the discussion

We uncovered the sex abuse scandal that rocked the WHO, but there’s more to do

We just covered a report that says the World Health Organization failed to prevent and tackle widespread sexual abuse during the Ebola response in Congo.

Our investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation triggered this probe, demonstrating the impact our journalism can have. 

But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking. 

We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone. 

The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and do more of this. 

Become a member today and support independent journalism

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.