1. Home
  2. East Africa
  3. Rwanda

Genocide justice system prompts row with Amnesty

[Rwanda] The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda - ICTR logo [New] ICTR
The ICTR has handed down 11 judgements since its inception in 1995

Rwanda has dismissed as unfounded a claim by Amnesty International that its justice system was unsuitable for trying genocide suspects currently detained abroad.

[Read this story in French]

Rwanda has always been keen to play a lead role in the prosecution of those suspected of taking part in the 1994 orchestrated slaughter of some 800,000 ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus.

Delivering justice domestically, rather than leaving it to international and foreign courts, was seen as being key to calming tensions that have persisted 13 years after the genocide.

In a statement, Amnesty urged countries holding genocide suspects to try them themselves instead of extraditing them to Rwanda, whose courts it alleged were insufficiently fair and impartial.

“What Amnesty International is not offering is actual facts and evidence,” Rwanda’s prosecutor general John Ngoga told IRIN. “It’s just blatant allegations. We will continue to pursue fugitives, wherever they are.”

Ngoga said he welcomed criticism of Rwanda’s legal system but that concerns should be aired through legal channels that allow Rwanda to respond formally.

He went on to question the credibility of Amnesty’s claim that the ‘gacaca’ system, in which genocide suspects are tried by community courts in their villages of origin, was flawed. Ngoga said he doubted the advocacy group had first-hand accounts of misdeeds.

“I have been in charge of this process and I have no recollection of ever meeting anybody from Amnesty International,” Ngoga said. “I’m not even aware if they are represented in Rwanda.”

Rwanda’s administration turned to the traditional ‘gacaca’ system in 2001, when the country’s jails were packed with more than 100,000 genocide suspects.

“Consistent reports that fair trial guarantees are not being applied in the ‘gacaca’ process undermines the whole legal system,” Amnesty said in the statement.

Amnesty also urged the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which tries the most serious genocide cases in the Tanzanian town of Arusha, to request an extension of its mandate, currently due to expire in December 2008.

After Kigali abolished the death penalty in July 2007, the ICTR agreed pending cases would be transferred to Rwanda.

nk/am/sr


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join