The sixth in a series of IRIN stories examining the obstacles Iraq faces in implementing its government’s plan to reconcile different sections of Iraqi society. Click on the following link for an overview of the series: Iraq reconciliation series overview
Like other public sectors in Iraq, the judicial system decayed during the three and a half decades of former President Saddam Hussein's 24-year rule, in which his government controlled it and directed judges to serve its interests.
This year though, Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki promised to make Iraq’s judicial system more independent, partly by making it the sole authority responsible for punishing crime, and partly by increasing its powers.
However, legal specialists say much still has to be done to make the judiciary truly independent. "The government has to protect the judicial system from any pressure from influential political parties or any social influences to achieve independence for this important sector," said Dr Ahmed Jabre Attwan, a legal expert at the College of Law, Baghdad University.
Attwan said Iraq’s government must choose independent judges carefully, and adopt tough measures against anyone who tries to influence this system for personal or political gain.
"Over the past three decades, there was just one party controlling the country's judicial system, but now the whole system is in the hands of many political parties, especially those who have militias," said a 65-year-old Iraqi judge who spoke on condition of anonymity due to his fear of reprisals.
Most judges refuse to speak with reporters, even anonymously. At least 11 judges have been killed in 2006.
"We can't do our job properly with all these pressures…” the judge said. “They [militias] are controlling everything everywhere, and they do whatever they want. They don't even hesitate to put pressure on us openly."
Iraq’s government also needs to fight corruption in the judiciary and get rid of those judges who were affiliated with Saddam's ousted Baath party, he said.
Thirty-seven judges and prosecutors who had been high-ranking Baath party members, have been dismissed since 2003, said Ali al-Lami, director general of the De-Baathification Commission, the body that led a purge of members of the disbanded Baath party from the military and government.
“But there is still a lag in the work of the justice ministry and judicial supreme council in this regard. They say that they still need some [who are Baathists] for their qualifications, and that there are no alternatives for the time being,” al-Lami said.
The New York-based watchdog, Human Rights Watch, has criticised the Iraq government’s handling of former president Saddam Hussein’s court case, by saying Iraq’s High Tribunal cannot fairly and effectively try Hussein and others "in accordance with international standards…”
The rights body condemned the manner in which the Iraqi government on 19 September was able to remove Judge Abdullah al-Amiri who was perceived to have been impartial by government officials.
"Judges must not be the subject of inflammatory criticism by government officials. Any process for disciplining or removing judges must occur in accordance with independent judicial procedures, and not take place in the court of public opinion," HRW stated.
Finding impartial judges, respected by all sides of Iraq’s political and sectarian divide, is no easy matter, say legal specialists.
"We do believe that those [judges] who have any political links to any party or even sympathy to any ethnic or political or religious group, should step down," Mowafaq al-Atraqchi, a Baghdad-based lawyer, said. "Only in this way can we get a judicial system which looks at cases with two eyes, not one."
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions
Help make quality journalism about crises possible
The New Humanitarian is an independent, non-profit newsroom founded in 1995. We deliver quality, reliable journalism about crises and big issues impacting the world today. Our reporting on humanitarian aid has uncovered sex scandals, scams, data breaches, corruption, and much more.
Our readers trust us to hold power in the multi-billion-dollar aid sector accountable and to amplify the voices of those impacted by crises. We’re on the ground, reporting from the front lines, to bring you the inside story.
We keep our journalism free – no paywalls – thanks to the support of donors and readers like you who believe we need more independent journalism in the world. Your contribution means we can continue delivering award-winning journalism about crises. Become a member of The New Humanitarian today.