1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. DRC

Latest ICG report analyses impasse in peace process

The failure of the inter-Congolese dialogue in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in October was foreseeable, according to a new report from the International Crisis Group, 'The Inter-Congolese Dialogue: Political Negotiation or a Game of Bluff?', that analyses the impasse in the peace process.

"President Joseph Kabila and his backers refuse to consider power-sharing through the dialogue with anti-government rebels without guarantees of Rwanda and Uganda's full withdrawal from DRC," the ICG stated on Friday. "At the same time, the rebels and their sponsors, including Rwanda and Uganda, refuse to consider full withdrawal until a transition government is established through the dialogue and their security is guaranteed. As a result, low-intensity conflict remains the preferred option for most of the external actors."

ICG central Africa project director Francois Grignon said: "Neither President Kabila's allies, nor his enemies, will allow full restoration of Congolese sovereignty and territorial integrity until their own political, economic and security 'shopping lists' have been satisfied. The international community should become more proactive in countering the dynamics that maintain the conflict in the Kivus. Until this occurs the inter-Congolese dialogue will remain a game of bluff."

ICG Africa programme co-director Fabienne Hara said the international community must recognise that the Kabila government was too weak to meet expectations without an external mediator or guarantor.

"The Lusaka cease-fire agreement, signed two years ago, must become a fully negotiated peace agreement," she said. "This requires much more active support for direct dialogue between the belligerents - ideally with the personal involvement of the UN Secretary-General. At the very least, the international community must establish a joint coordination mechanism on disarmament, demobilisation, repatriation, resettlement and reintegration (DDRRR) of the armed groups - as called for in UN Resolution 1376 of 7 November 2001."

According to ICG, "detailed preparation work must be undertaken, and lessons learned from the failure in Addis Ababa before any new meeting is called in South Africa. Energetic diplomacy is needed to bring the parties closer together and a detailed review of the entire process, including the methodology of the facilitation team, must be carried out."

ICG is a private, multinational organisation working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and contain conflict.

For the complete report, go to http://www.crisisweb.org


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join