1. Home
  2. East Africa
  3. Rwanda

Plans to reform traditional courts

Rwanda plans to reform traditional gacaca court by slashing the number of courts and judges as it seeks to apply the system countrywide, an official told IRIN on Tuesday.

"Drawing from the experience during pilot trials, we have decided to make a lot of amendments aimed at checking on some weaknesses before the courts are rolled out," said Charles Kayitana, a spokesman for Inkiko-Gacaca, the National Service of Gacaca Jurisdictions.

He said under the proposed reforms, the number of judges would reduce from the current 258,209 to 169,400. The number of judges per court would go from 19 to nine and the highest two levels of courts would be scrapped.

Inkiko-Gacaca, which means gacaca courts in the local Kinyarwanda language, was introduced in 2001 to ease pressure on the national justice system in relation to the 1994 genocide where at least 80,000 suspects are in detention awaiting trial. Others are still at large.

As part of the reforms, the National Service plans to hold fresh elections for new judges in early July before the courts begin operating. Unlike the first elections that were open to all registered voters, this time only current judges of gacaca courts would vote, the service's spokesman said.

"We want to choose from the existing judges the most competent and educated ones to run the courts at the sector and cell levels," Kayitana said.

Trial runs of gacaca courts were held in only 106 of the 10,555 courts nationwide.

The National Service also recently announced that it would introduce computers to speed up trials, as well as to make it easier and faster for information to flow between village courts and the commission's secretariat.

Gacaca courts in villages give residents, prisoners and the families of victims an opportunity to face each other about their roles and experiences during the 100 days of genocide in which, according to the government, at least some 937,000 people died. There proceeding will take place before a panel of locally elected judges who then issue verdicts.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join