Share & more
The coordination of the UN's emergency operations has been considerably improved in response to internal and donor pressure, yet the disappointing donor response to the resulting Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) has left vital relief programmes threatened, a senior UN official said on
Thursday. Many of those involved are questioning whether the extensive resources put into the drafting and consolidation of the appeals can be justified. "If one adds up the total requirements of the various consolidated appeals for the Great Lakes region against the funds received, we reach an average of 31 percent, as of early July," said Ross Mountain, director of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) in Geneva. "Coordination is of limited use if we have
nothing to coordinate except ideas and concepts," he added.
Mountain was speaking at the launch of a revised appeal for US $2.3 billion for UN agencies to assist 26 million people at risk around the globe. In addition to revising its appeals for the Great Lakes region, Somalia and Sudan, the UN launched two new consolidated appeals for the DRC and the Republic of Congo. The Consolidated Appeals Process puts a huge strain on UN humanitarian workers in the field and "when one considers the response of the donor community to the 1998 and now 1999
appeals, many agencies are starting to wonder if all these efforts are not wasted", said Mountain.
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions