The New Humanitarian Annual Report 2021

  1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. East Africa
  4. DRC

Reactions from the DRC to ICC acquittal of militia leader

Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui
Mathieu Ngudjolo was acquitted of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Congo's northeastern Ituri District (ICC-CPI/Marco Okhuizen)

In its second-ever verdict, the International Criminal Court (ICC), on 18 December, acquitted former militia leader Mathieu Ngudjolo [Chui] of war crimes and crimes against humanity relating to a 2003 massacre in Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) northeastern Ituri District. 

Ordering the immediate release of Ngudjolo, ICC judges said the prosecution - which has 30 days to appeal the ruling - had failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that he had been in command of fighters from the Lendu community who attacked the village of Bogoro on 24 February 2003.

Before delivering the verdict, presiding judge Bruno Cotte said that “declaring an accused person not guilty does not mean the Chamber declares him innocent”. The French judge stressed that this decision “does not in any way deny the suffering of the population on that day”.

IRIN has collected reactions from Bunia, the main town in Ituri, where a 1999-2005 conflict between the Lendu and Hema communities caused tens of thousands of deaths and massive displacement:

Gaby, bartender:  “We are satisfied because most thought that the court is for Africans and particularly for the Congolese… [But] justice is not fair. [Hema militia leader] Thomas Lubanga was convicted in March of recruiting child soldiers. We thought Ngudjolo would also be convicted. We are surprised he was acquitted.”

Chantale, maid: “I think this decision is unfair because he destroyed our region. He should remain in prison. His name was mentioned a lot in the massacres of 2002 and 2003.”

Lendu, resident: “There is no evidence against him, so he's right. This judgment is valid.”

Richard, taxi driver: “For me, it is the ICC that has all the power - to arrest, convict, set free. If Ngudjolo is being released, I applaud that.”

Mateso, storekeeper: “Nobody has seen the killings in Bogoro. The government arrested him on the basis of hearsay. Luckily, God acted and freed him. We are thankful for that and expect Ngudjolo to return so that we can build the country together.”

Dieudonné, technician: “Many people who are at the Hague trial talk about what happened in Ituri, yet they have not experienced, and do not know, the truth. It’s understandable that they lack evidence to convict Ngudjolo.”

Bossa Me Mitterrand, human rights activist with the NGO Justice Plus: "We recommend the prosecutor file an appeal… We ask the new prosecutor [Fatou Bensouda, who replaced Luis Moreno-Ocampo earlier in 2012] to extend the investigations because we believe that Thomas Lubanga, Germain Katanga [another Lendu leader, still on trial at the ICC] and others are only small fry and there are big fish that are still at large. There are people in neighboring countries that have trained, funded and equipped these rebels, but until now nobody has been prosecuted for this. The prosecutor should not restrict himself to those who carried out their orders.”

Human Rights Watch:Mitterrand’s view is echoed by a statement Human Rights Watch (HRW) released after the acquittal. The ICC “should re-energize efforts to prosecute others for atrocities in the DRC,” it said.

“The acquittal of Ngudjolo leaves the victims of Bogoro and other massacres by his forces without justice for their suffering,” said Géraldine Mattioli-Zeltner, HRW international justice advocacy director. 

“The ICC prosecutor needs to strengthen its investigations of those responsible for grave crimes in Ituri, including high-ranking officials in DRC, Rwanda, and Uganda who supported the armed groups fighting there,” she added.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information:

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.