1. Home
  2. Asia
  3. Nepal

Political impasse stalls disaster preparedness bill

Students under their desks during an earthquake drill in Nepal's Bhaktapur District
(David Swanson/IRIN)

Protracted political wrangling in Nepal is preventing a key piece of disaster preparedness legislation from reaching parliament.

Endorsed by the cabinet in October 2009, the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management (NSDRM) has yet to be made into law.

“The passing of this bill is critical. Without this, the country’s disaster preparedness efforts cannot move forward,” Amod Dixit, executive director of the National Society for Earthquake Technology, told IRIN in Kathmandu.

Nepal is described by the Asia Disaster Preparedness Center as one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world; according to the UN, Nepal is ranked the 11th most at-risk country in terms of earthquakes.

Disaster management currently operates under the 1982 National Calamity Act, which assigns response roles in the aftermath of a disaster to the Central Natural Disaster Relief Committee chaired by the minister of home affairs.

Under the Committee funds and resources for disaster preparedness and mitigation are limited, and while response capacity for small-scale disasters is strong, disaster risk reduction capacity remains a challenge.

“This is something that needs to change. We need to develop a capacity for mega-disasters,” said Rameshwor Dangal, under-secretary in the disaster management section of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA). 

Clear delineation of roles

The need for a new strategy first came to light following the 1993 south-central floods, prompting Nepal’s first national conference on disaster risk management in Kathmandu.

“The message of the conference was clear: There should be a shift from response to preparedness and mitigation,” Dixit said.

Drafted by Dixit in January 2008, the NSDRM endeavours to do just that, providing guidance on improving the policy and legal environment, and prioritizing strategic interventions.

The strategy now awaiting parliamentary approval maps out what needs to be done by stakeholders to reduce risks associated with natural disasters, and calls for the establishment of a National Commission for Disaster Risk Management under the direct authority of the prime minister.

“Without the clear delineation of roles and responsibilities across different ministries, disaster management activities are being held back,” said George Murray, head of the humanitarian support unit at the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Kathmandu.

Political instability

Despite its importance, no one knows if and when this key piece of legislation will be passed. Without it, getting policies and stakeholders in place to back it will prove difficult.

“To implement this, we need to get all the stakeholders, including donors, the government, NGOs, the UN and private sector behind it,” MoHA’s Dangal said.

Much of the problem lies in the political uncertainty that has plagued Nepal since the end of the 10-year Maoist conflict (1996-2006), which left over 13,000 dead.

More than four years since the signing of a peace deal between the Maoists and the then royal government, the government is now on its fourth prime minister, can barely agree on a new cabinet, and is struggling to draft a new constitution - seen by many as the country’s number one priority at the moment.

Meanwhile, with reportedly hundreds of bills awaiting parliamentary approval, and experts warning of the next big quake, humanitarian agencies are doing their best to remain optimistic.

“As the new government is in the making, we hope that the act will be presented with priority in parliament,” Umesh Prasad Dhakal, executive director of the Nepal Red Crescent Society, said.



This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article
Join the discussion

It was The New Humanitarian’s investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation that uncovered sexual abuse by aid workers during the Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of Congo and led the World Health Organization to launch an independent review and reform its practices.

This demonstrates the important impact that our journalism can have. 

But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking. 

We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.

The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and shine a light on similar abuses. 

Become a member today and support independent journalism

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.