The New Humanitarian Annual Report 2021

  1. Home
  2. Asia
  3. Bangladesh

Poor braced for “Monga” season

In monga-affected Rangpur District, these women don't know what the future holds.
(Shamsuddin Ahmed/IRIN)

The annual “monga” season of deprivation has arrived in Kurigram, as well as six other northern areas, including Nilphamari, Lalmonirhat, Gaibandha, Rangpur, Panchagarh and Thakurgaon - some of the poorest of Bangladesh’s 64 districts.  
During the monga season - which generally begins at the end of September - there are no crops to be harvested and very little work, so many farmers rush to the cities to become temporary rickshaw pullers or day labourers in an effort to pay off loans and earn much-needed cash to take back to their families.
However, many return even poorer than before, while others do not come back at all, running away from the hunger that awaits them at home.
Flood-generated famine
Each year, tens of thousands of people from hundreds of villages along the banks of the Teesta, Dudhkumar, Dhorla and Brahmaputra rivers in Bangladesh’s northern region face monga. Natural disasters such as flooding, riverbank erosion and drought exacerbate this annual occurrence, leaving scores vulnerable to hunger and disease, while at the same time fuelling poverty levels.   
Because of recent monsoon flooding, thousands of poor families lost their incomes and livelihoods, and the prolonged effect has reduced food security in the area.
Many farmers place all their financial assets into securing tools, seeds and fertiliser for the rice harvest, only to lose it all in the floods, becoming paupers overnight.
In case of an “aman” crop (60 percent of Bangladesh’s rice yield) failure due to floods in July-August means food insecurity intensifies in September-October until the “boro” crop (40 percent) can be harvested in November-December.
Women and minorities suffer most
“The immediate impact of monga is on employment, then on household incomes, then on food security, and finally on nutrition levels,” Rakhal Chandra Kangshabanik, former deputy director of the Ministry of Agriculture, told IRIN.
Women and female-headed households fare the worst, he said, partly because there is already a greater likelihood of them being malnourished and partly because of discrimination.
“When there is an oversupply of day-labour, employers tend to hire men rather than women,” Kangshabanik said.
The impact on local indigenous minorities is also severe.
“Relief materials and other safety net assistance are distributed first among those who have the power. We receive only the trickles,” said Dwijen Sharma, president of Panchbibi Upajila Adibashi (indigenous people) Multipurpose Development Organisation (PUAMDO), an indigenous people’s rights organisation in Joyporhat District.  

Photo: Shamsuddin Ahmed/IRIN
People in northern Lalmonirhat District brought out their rice bowls demanding immediate food relief

Monga in the “chars”
Monga manifests most viciously among the “chars” or river islands, where some 600,000 of the poorest people live.  
They flood in July as the rainwater from the Himalayas rushes southwards, reappearing only in November. Most of the displaced live along the river banks until the rains stop and the rivers begin to recede.
According to relief agencies, residents of the chars and displaced landless farm labourers along river embankments are more vulnerable to chronic poverty than most.  
The floods displace them in July-August before the monga sets in from September through early November.
For them, alternative income sources are even more scarce than on the mainland.
There are no brickfields, only a handful of paddy-processing facilities, very limited construction and road works, no rickshaws and little scope for business activities.

According to a 2006 survey of 425,000 families in the monga zone by Palli Karma Shahayak Foundation Palli Karma Shahayak Foundation, an NGO, and the country’s Institute of Microfinance, about 20 percent had no choice but to sell their assets and property to feed their families, while 40 percent had to migrate to other places for jobs.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information:

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.