A Ugandan government plan to scale down "protected villages" in the rebel-hit north, while basically welcomed, has also attracted criticism that it is no solution to the army's protracted war against the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA).
"It is not a question of scaling down," Gulu area MP Norbert Mao told IRIN on Monday. "The villages should be dismantled and the government come up with a firm policy to step up security."
As a strategy to curb insurgency, the protected villages had failed, Mao said. "We have never supported these camps. Our people will not miss them."
"The camps were not for the protection of civilians, but to control their movement," Mao added, saying they were "major arenas for human rights abuses".
"People become totally dependent on the military and are highly vulnerable to acts of rape and illegal arrests," he noted. He argued there was no provision for humanitarian assistance such as health facilities, and that people were simply rounded up and forced into the villages.
The protected village policy was mooted by the government of Uganda and supported by some villagers who thought it would ensure protection from the LRA, as well as denying the rebels logistical support, food and new recruits. However, the policy later became unpopular with allegations of gross human rights violations in the camps.
Press reports recently quoted Gulu army commander Brigadier Wamala Katumba as saying the armed forces intended to establish more detachments "so we can decongest protected villages".
The deputy editor of the independent daily 'The Monitor', David Ouma Balikowa, said the concept of protected villages had failed and local communities blamed them for the destruction of family units.
"Girl children are victims of early pregnancies, abductions [by the rebels] still go on and there are many other acts of human rights violations," he told IRIN.
The human rights group Amnesty International cautiously welcomed the government's plans.
"In principle it could be a good idea if well applied to guarantee respect for human rights," African regional office director Patrice Vahard told IRIN. "It could allow people to go back and till their lands, but they must be assured of protection against attacks. They must feel secure."
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions
Help make quality journalism about crises possible
The New Humanitarian is an independent, non-profit newsroom founded in 1995. We deliver quality, reliable journalism about crises and big issues impacting the world today. Our reporting on humanitarian aid has uncovered sex scandals, scams, data breaches, corruption, and much more.
Our readers trust us to hold power in the multi-billion-dollar aid sector accountable and to amplify the voices of those impacted by crises. We’re on the ground, reporting from the front lines, to bring you the inside story.
We keep our journalism free – no paywalls – thanks to the support of donors and readers like you who believe we need more independent journalism in the world. Your contribution means we can continue delivering award-winning journalism about crises. Become a member of The New Humanitarian today.