1. Home
  2. Americas
  3. Haiti

Natural disasters - a rare positive trend?

Haitian civilians unload relief supplies from a US Navy ship
(Marion Doss/Flickr)

Haiti has marked the fifth anniversary of the earthquake that left much of the country devastated and killed up to 300,000 people, with solemn ceremonies taking place in the capital Port-au-Prince and other cities.

That earthquake’s impact was so severe partly because, as Wikileaks cables revealed, the country was woefully unprepared for such an event.

The anniversary follows the similar marking of ten years since the 2004 Asian tsunami, which killed at least 200,000 people. Both disasters were among the deadliest in recent history.

Yet research published last week suggests the impact of natural catastrophes is falling globally.

The study by the insurance leaders Munich Re found that the number of natural catastrophes in 2014 was higher than average, with 980 events compared to a 10-year average of 830 (chart 1).

Yet the damage caused by those catastrophes was far lower than average, with 7,700 deaths in 2014 compared to a 10-year average of nearly 100,000 (chart 2). For insurance purposes, financial losses were also smaller – $31 billion, rather than an average of $58 billion.

India and the Philippines are among the countries that have
improved their disaster preparedness, according to Ernst Rauch, head of
Munich Re’s Corporate Climate Center. In particular, he said, the two
countries have vastly improved warning systems to the public and are more clearly communicating technical information to the people.

A 'random' year

However, Rauch cautioned that the lower number of deaths was not necessarily a trend that would continue.  2014 saw an unusually quiet hurricane season in North America, while larger catastrophes that occurred tended not to be in heavily populated areas.

“We currently have in some countries a limited number of examples of positive impacts of public warning and evacuation measures. It is still too early to talk about a general trend. However, it is fair to highlight these examples and discuss them with relevant stakeholders on a broader scale,” he said.

Terry Cannon, research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, said the figure was “purely random”. A more detailed breakdown of the data was needed to draw clearer conclusions, he added.


Share this article
Join the discussion

Hundreds of thousands of readers trust The New Humanitarian each month for quality journalism that contributes to more effective, accountable, and inclusive ways to improve the lives of people affected by crises.

Our award-winning stories inform policymakers and humanitarians, demand accountability and transparency from those meant to help people in need, and provide a platform for conversation and discussion with and among affected and marginalised people.

We’re able to continue doing this thanks to the support of our donors and readers like you who believe in the power of independent journalism. These contributions help keep our journalism free and accessible to all.

Show your support as we build the future of news media by becoming a member of The New Humanitarian. 

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.