A new report analysing the aid response to Cyclone Pam has once again found international agencies guilty of failing to co-ordinate effectively with local and national actors.
One size doesn’t fit all, produced by CARE, World Vision, Oxfam Australia and Save the Children Australia, notes how in the aftermath of the cyclone, scores of international NGOs “flooded” into Vanuatu - “many with no established relationships and minimal knowledge of national actors and institutions”.
Although the report acknowledges “a lot of positives” in the Cyclone Pam response - such as the ability of the Ni-Vanuatu people to quickly rebuild their homes and government authorities working around the clock to get things done in the face of enormous logistical constraints – it also highlights several issues.
These included: community readiness to mitigate the impact of a large-scale disaster; whether the “the influx” of international agencies and humanitarian response systems was “appropriate”; and how international response can be better tailored to support, without overwhelming or pushing aside, national actors.
Except from One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Tailoring the International Response to the National Need Following Vanuatu’s Cyclone Pam - an NGO report published June 2015
If this all sounds rather familiar, that’s because it is.
Barely a month goes by without a new report or panel event urging better co-ordination between local, national and international actors in disaster response situations; more advance community resilience building; and greater investment into countering climate change.
Here's a taste of IRIN's coverage of such lessons supposedly learnt:
Indeed in the days after Cyclone Pam, the Vanuatu government complained about how international aid organisations had complicated the response by not co-ordinating with local teams.
“The problem is everyone wants visibility...everyone wants their sign put on it,” one official said.
Christina Bennett, a Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) researcher at London’s Overseas Development Institute (ODI), told IRIN: “We hear these complaints over and over and over again, but the behaviour of international aid agencies remains unchanged .”
And she asked: “How much longer are we going to talk about this without really making a change?”
One size doesn’t fit all was published as a contribution to the Pacific Regional Consultation for the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS) which has been taking place this week in New Zealand.
For the last few days the great and the good of the aid world have been tweeting via the hashtag #ReShapeAid lots of positive dictums about listening more to communities, localising aid and learning lessons.
No-one can disagree with what’s being said, but we are wondering when the the talk turn into action?
It was The New Humanitarian’s investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation that uncovered sexual abuse by aid workers during the Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of Congo and led the World Health Organization to launch an independent review and reform its practices.
This demonstrates the important impact that our journalism can have.
But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking.
We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.
The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and shine a light on similar abuses.