1. Home
  2. Middle East and North Africa
  3. Israel

Three years after ICJ barrier ruling, access to land still a problem

Jamal Salman, from Hable village. His land was divided in half by the barrier, and he is concerned about crops on the other side, as he no longer has a permit to access the "seam zone". Shabtai Gold/IRIN

Three years ago, in July 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague issued an advisory opinion, which, by a vote of 14 to one, declared the barrier illegal, and expressed particular concern that parts of it were being built within the occupied Palestinian territory.

In the Qalqilya district of the northern West Bank, many Palestinians were separated from their agricultural land and livelihood, because the barrier did not always follow the internationally recognised ‘green line’ between Israel and the Palestinian area.

Others found themselves divided from the rest of the West Bank. Overall, about 15 villages remain in the ‘seam zone’ between the serpentine path of the barrier and the border. According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 50,000 Palestinians will be located in that zone when the barrier is complete.

The ICJ observed that these pockets were created for the benefit of Israeli settlements, which it declared were also illegal under international humanitarian law.

More on Israel's barrier
 For farmers, much of their land remains out of reach
 Trapped between the lines
 Wall creates Palestinian cultural divide
 Ghettos form in shadow of the wall
 Palestinian homes abandoned in flight across Israel’s wall
Behind the barrier: Mas`ha

The once successful industrial zone in the village of Mas`ha is virtually a ghost town. The barrier, here a mix of concrete slabs 8m high, fencing and barbed wire, runs right up against the village.

Residents and aid workers say this village, like others in the region, has lost commerce, particularly from Israel, as well as agricultural profit.

"The majority of the businesses here have shut down since the wall was built," said Moad Issa, a labourer working in a furniture shop, one of the few storefronts still open.

"It's now much harder to find work," lamented Issa, who is registered with the UN Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA). His small salary as an unskilled labourer feeds his three younger siblings and two ageing parents.

Israeli security officials say the barrier protects people inside Israel from militant attacks, but admit the route took settlements into consideration. When complete, the barrier will surround Mas`ha from three sides.

An enclave: `Azzun `Atma

On the other side of those settlements, to the west, lies `Azzun `Atma, a town with several thousand residents, which has been turned into an enclave by the barrier's path. Access to the village is through a gate run by the military.

About eight families are divided from the rest of the village by an Israeli-controlled road.

"The lack of guaranteed access to emergency healthcare through the barrier gate at night is the biggest problem. Women are left most vulnerable," said Rosemary Willey-Asana', from OCHA in Jerusalem, for example, choosing home births or leaving the village during the last stage of pregnancy to avoid the barrier.

Shlomo Dror, a spokesman for Israel's Defense Ministry, said the military worked to "provide solutions to all humanitarian concerns", and there was no problem accessing healthcare. The gates would be opened at any time if needed, he added.


Photo: Shabtai Gold/IRIN
A military gate in the fence at the edge of Mas`ha village
Permit regime

Many ‘seam zone’ Palestinians need permits to stay in their homes and villages. Friends and family require different permits to visit. Similarly, farmers must receive permits to access land, which is contingent upon a schedule determined by the Civil Administration.

Dror said there were more than 60 gates in the barrier, for access to agricultural lands. He said the army was working to improve the gates and ensure farmers got the right permits.

However, a UNRWA official who studied the system, said: "The gates were never designed to offer a comprehensive humanitarian solution." He noted in certain areas residents' needs were not being met, and the gates "in some cases are in totally arbitrary places".

shg/ar/mw


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join