1. Home
  2. Asia
  3. Pakistan

Afghan refugees concerned over imminent closure of two camps in Balochistan

[Pakistan] Agha Janan, a banana seller at Balochistan's Girdi Jungle refugee camp worries about growing insecurity in his homeland. [Date picture taken: 03/04/2007] Ali Mohammad Sabawoon/IRIN
Afghan refugees living in two camps slated for closure later this year in Pakistan’s southwestern Balochistan province have expressed strong concern over their future plight, saying fear of violence was the main reason they did not want to return to their homeland.

“The majority of the refugees here come from the southern provinces of Kandahar and Helmand province where the Taliban are strongest,” Shamsaddin Shams, a shopkeeper at the Jungle Pir Alizai refugee camp 62 km west of Quetta, Balochistan’s provincial capital, told IRIN.

The camp is home to some 35,000 Afghan refugees.

“We don’t know what to do,” Shams said. “Everyone knows that these provinces are insecure and many of the people living there now are actually displaced from their own places of origin out of fear of further fighting and bombardment.”

Akram, another refugee at the camp, agreed. Originally from the northern province of Mazar-i Sharif, he said his family’s land had been seized by Uzbek militants working in the area, making the probability of their return all but impossible.

“As ethnic Pashtoons, we are the minority in the province. Our relatives are now displaced, living in the south of the country, and wouldn’t dare return now.”

Second camp faces closure

A second Baloch camp facing closure is the Girdi Jungle camp, where another 40,000 Afghans live. It is 400 km from Quetta and close to the Iranian border. Residents there raised similar concerns.

“I am very sad. I will not go. It’s better for the government to kill us,” Agha Janan, a banana seller from Afghanistan’s northern Kunduz province, said.

Abdul Ghafoor, a school teacher at the camp, had a question for Balochistan’s government and the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR): “How can you willingly ask us to return to places like Helmand and Kandahar knowing how bad the security is there?”

That is a question repeatedly being asked by the 2.15 million registered Afghans living in Pakistan today.


Photo: IRIN
There are approximately 75,000 Afghans living in the two camps in Balochistan that now face closure
According to a recent report on the registration of Afghans living in the country, the majority of Afghans registered (82 percent) said they had no intention of returning to their homeland in the near future, with 41 percent citing insecurity as the primary impediment to their return.

However, the decision to proceed with the closure of the two camps in Balochistan, alongside the Katchagari and Jalozai refugee camps in Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province, home to another 150,000 Afghans, was already reaffirmed in February at the Tripartite Commission meeting between Afghanistan, Pakistan and the UNHCR.

“Haven for terrorists”

Majeed Khan Achakzi, a member of the Baloch provincial assembly, told IRIN that the camps had become a haven for terrorists working in the area, adding that Jungle Pir Alizai had become a base for drug traffickers, smugglers and thieves.

“We have hosted the refugees and tolerated risks for more than 20 years. Enough is enough,” Achakzi said.

Likely closure dates

Dunya Khan, a UNHCR spokeswoman in Quetta, confirmed that the two camps in Balochistan would indeed close, with Jungle Pir Alizai likely to close by 15 June, and Girdi Jungle by 31 August, adding that residents would, however, have the option to either relocate to the Ghazgai Minara refugee camp in Loralai district, about 300km south of Quetta - and where they would continue to receive basic assistance in terms of primary education, health care and access to water and sanitation - or to repatriate to their homeland with UNHCR assistance.

Read more

 UN-assisted repatriation drive resumes for registered refugees only

 UN refugee agency faces deficit in Afghan repatriation funds

 Surge of Afghans repatriating

 Slow start to Afghan repatriation

Afghans registered in the country who choose the latter could receive an enhanced assistance, transport and reintegration package, including a grant of approximately US $100, Khan said, while those Afghans affected by camp closure who could not repatriate at the moment would receive transport to, and assistance in, the government-identified camps in Pakistan.

Since the launch of UNHCR’s voluntary repatriation effort in March 2002, close to three million Afghans have returned to their homeland.

The refugee agency’s planning figure for Afghan returns in 2007 is 250,000 from Pakistan and Iran, the primary host countries of the Afghan diaspora.

as/ds/ar/cb

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join