1. Home
  2. East Africa
  3. Kenya

Cabinet sacked after gov't loses constitutional referendum

[Kenya] President Mwai Kibaki announcing the dismissal of his entire cabinet. [Date picture taken: 11/23/2005] State House, Nairobi
President Mwai Kibaki.
Kenya's President Mwai Kibaki sacked his entire cabinet on Wednesday, two days after the draft constitution he strongly supported was rejected in a national referendum. The debate over the new charter had split Kibaki's administration, with seven members of his cabinet spearheading a vociferous campaign against it. "Following the results of the referendum, it has become necessary for me, as the President of the Republic, to re-organize my Government to make it more cohesive and better able to serve the people of Kenya," Kibaki said in a statement broadcast on radio and television. "Accordingly, in accordance with the powers conferred upon me under the Constitution of Kenya, I have directed that the offices of all Ministers and all Assistant Ministers become vacant. Consequently, the occupants of the said offices cease to hold their respective offices with immediate effect," he said. The president added that a reconstituted government would be announced within two weeks. Some 3.5 million people voted against the draft constitution, compared with 2.5 million in favour. When Kibaki’s administration came into power at the beginning of 2003, it pledged to give Kenyans a more democratic constitution within the first 100 days of its term. Internal wrangling within the lose alliance of disparate political parties that make up the governing National Rainbow Coalition, however, seemed to have thwarted all efforts at forging a consensus on several contentious issues in the draft constitution. Members of the cabinet who opposed the proposed basic law argued that the draft maintained a presidency with overriding powers. They asserted that Kenyans started agitating for a new constitution more than 15 years earlier because they believed that Kibaki's predecessor had misused his presidential powers to undermine democracy and weaken the economy. Supporters of the draft constitution, on the other hand, maintained that presidential powers had been significantly curtailed in the proposed basic law. They pointed out, for example, that under the new document all presidential appointments were to be subjected to vetting by parliament and that the president was required to share executive power with a prime minister, various constitutional commissions and proposed district governments. The rejection of the proposed constitution was widely seen as a significant blow to Kibaki and a boost for Roads and Public Works Minister Raila Odinga, the de facto leader of the ministers who waged an unrelenting campaign against the document.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join