1. Home
  2. Southern Africa
  3. Zimbabwe

ZIMBABWE: Reform groups reject government consitutional proposals

Zimbabwean civic groups met on Tuesday to thrash out a new strategy following their rejection of the government's constitutional reform proposals which they alleged were an attempt by the ruling ZANU-PF party to entrench itself in power. National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) spokesman Welshman Ncube told IRIN the pro-reform groups would boycott the government's constitutional review structure and pursue a parallel process based on popular participation. Last week, President Robert Mugabe said consitutional reform would proceed on the basis of a commission of inquiry. Its members would include the 150 deputies in the ZANU-PF dominated parliament, and a further 150 commissioners chosen by the government. Mugabe accused groups like the NCA - a coalition of churches, human rights activists, trade unions and professional associations - of "viewing the constitutional review exercise as an opportunity to seek immediate political and legal empowerment," the state-owned Ziana news agency reported. He said the current constitution, which vests enormous power in the hands of the presidency, is a legal document "perfectly in order and therefore can remain like that." "It is not just the appointment of commissioners by the government we oppose," Ncube said. "It is essentially the statutes under which the government proposes to proceed." Under existing law, a commission of inquiry can merely recommend, while Mugabe has the power to ignore its proposals, remove commissioners, or redefine its terms of reference. The NCA instead wants an independent commission to draft a constitution which would then be put to a referendum and enacted by parliament without amendment. "We are not prepared to run the risk of proceeding under a law which allows the president to do as he likes," Ncube said. "The people of Zimbabwe should be telling the government 'this is our constitution'." Opposition groups view the current constitution as highly partisan, saying it negates fundamental human rights. They claim that parliament, in which 30 of the 150 members are appointed by Mugabe, merely acts as a rubber stamp for the executive, which also controls the conduct of national elections.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join