Increased attention to the delivery of HIV prevention and treatment programmes is needed to prepare communities for a potential roll-out of a vaccine, which will most probably be partially-effective, experts say.
“How to deliver a 31 percent effective vaccine - it’s hard stuff, it’s uncharted territory, and it’s un-costed territory,” Mitchell Warren, executive director of the New York-based NGO AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (AVAC), told IRIN.
Proven to be 31 percent effective, however, it also raised questions about how a partially-effective vaccine could contribute to HIV prevention.
“I think we have seen modelling potential vaccines take us as far as we can get until we have more data points about how a vaccine is going to operate - making concrete some of the assumptions such as efficacy, and how we would deliver it programmatically,” Warren said.
According to the Joint UN Programme on AIDS (UNAIDS), about 2.5 million people are infected with HIV annually. Developing a vaccine against HIV has been an elusive goal, since the discovery of the virus more than three decades ago.
While waiting on a vaccine…
“Vaccines are not part of the 2013 guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) on [HIV] treatment access because it is not possible to establish guidelines for products unless they have been qualified for use. To date there is no vaccine which is considered safe and effective,” a spokesperson for UNAIDS e-mailed IRIN from Geneva, adding that the agency supports efforts to find such a vaccine.
While it remains unclear when - or if - a vaccine will be approved for HIV/AIDS, experts agree the success of the roll-out depends largely on work that must begin now. There are currently 35 ongoing AIDS vaccine trials internationally.
The scale-up of HIV-testing programmes will be crucial, as will close monitoring of logistical issues surrounding vaccine delivery, they say.
“If we have a vaccine of moderate efficacy, say 50-70 percent, I think we should still use it. But we must not create a false sense of security,” Michael Merson, director of the Global Health Institute at Duke University in the US state of North Carolina, told IRIN.
“The conversation we should be having right now definitely should include a prospective vaccine, but it should be grounded in a comprehensive understanding of which interventions work best to prevent HIV in different populations,” he said.
Learning from other vaccines
According to WHO, while there are many guidelines on vaccine implementation, none specifically address partially effective vaccines. Experts say there are a range of factors that must be considered, and that some of them are already addressed in public health interventions.
“There are some basic issues about the vaccine that will determine the specifics of its roll-out,” said Duke’s Merson. “What are the features of the vaccine? Are we talking about an oral vaccine? An injectable vaccine? What age group is it going to be given to? And how often does it have to be given?” he asked, noting the answers have implications for cost and public education.
According to Warren, officials can learn from ongoing dissemination of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, he said.
“Not only is it a great, highly-effective vaccine, but it also is our first great example of a vaccine that we need to deliver to young men and women,” Warren said, adding that adolescents will also be a likely target group for an AIDS vaccine.
Concerns about consent, the vaccinated feeling more emboldened to engage in risky sexual behaviours, and parental resistance to having their children vaccinated, should not be dismissed, he added.
“If we focus on the HPV vaccine as the bedrock, whenever we do get the AIDS vaccine it can be built into what we know from the HPV experience,” he said, echoing claims by a group of scientists who examined potential lessons from other vaccines for HIV.
“The second part is the logistics - the management, the operational components, the distribution of the vaccine,” said Merson.
Moreover, “once you make people aware of the vaccine and create the operational system, you must ensure a supply of vaccine,” he said.
“Failure to do so could create a sense of distrust in the health care system and discourage the population from taking other vaccines or seeking health care in general.”
Donor community awareness
According to Naresh Pratap Kc, director of Nepal’s National Centre for AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Disease Control (NCASC), preparing health systems for an HIV vaccine goes beyond cold chains and delivery issues.
“Countries like Nepal have a strong development infrastructure in terms of agencies and projects ongoing in-country,” Kc told IRIN, saying this can be a strength or weakness depending on how the agencies’ reach and influence are leveraged.
“Educating people who need the vaccine is part of it, but educating development agencies about how to work in each country is another part of it. We can’t just assume the agencies know what they’re doing with an AIDS vaccine because they know experiences in another country or for another vaccine,” he said, reinforcing the UNAIDS and WHO call, first made in 2002, but still relevant now, to educate policy-makers with accurate scientific facts about an HIV vaccine as early as possible in the roll-out process.
While waiting on a vaccine, there are other proven prevention methods, activists emphasize.
“We need to not wait until we have a vaccine. It is not magic. It’s not going to appear in people’s arms because they’re at risk of HIV,” Warren told IRIN.
“Some people say a vaccine is the only way to end the epidemic. A vaccine doesn’t end an epidemic if people don’t come in to get tested, so there are a series of issues we need to overcome now,” he said.
Modelling of a partially-effective HIV vaccine at 30 percent and 60 percent coverage of the men who have sex with men (MSM) in one part of Australia showed modest results, reducing incidence rate (newly diagnosed cases) by a maximum of 23 percent over 10 years. The authors recommended in 2011 that a partially-effective vaccine be “supplemented with other biomedical and educational strategies”.
But research published in 2008 also warned that uptake of standard vaccines (including measles, mumps, and rubella) among populations most affected by HIV in the US was among the lowest nationwide, suggesting it may be difficult to encourage vaccination among the people who most need it, given the stigma of people infected with HIV.
According to experts, this challenge highlights the need for better delivery methods, a scale-up current successful interventions, and improving what Warren calls “the science of delivery”.
“To think about delivery the day after a product is proven is too late,” Warren told IRIN.
According to UNAIDS and WHO, the efficacy of a first generation HIV vaccine may be moderate. However the overall public health efficacy may be higher when combined with other forms of prevention.
Warren agreed that the silos of HIV prevention must be broken.
“It’s not vaccine, or PrEP, or microbicide - it’s vaccine and PrEP and microbicide and combination prevention and understanding where prevention fits in with treatment,” said Warren referring to pre-exposure prophylaxis, the use of antiretroviral drugs by HIV-negative people to reduce the risk of their acquiring HIV, and microbicides, vaginal and anal gels containing anti-retroviral drugs.
“If there is a vaccine that works, say, 60 or 70 percent, I think we would be comfortable with it once it got all the international approval,” said Kc of Nepal’s NCASC. “But I would ask the key affected populations their views on implementation design first.”
Many HIV prevention advocates agree, saying that communities who carry the heaviest burden of HIV risk and infection should be at the core of policy and programme delivery decisions.
Economic projections have shown that focusing on “key affected populations”, including MSM, people who inject drugs, and sex workers, can be cost-effective, an important consideration given dwindling HIV/AIDS funding.
And given how much efficacy depends on how much of the population is vaccinated (and who), experts stress the importance of “social research investigating the likely acceptance and response of the introduction of a partially-effective vaccine”.
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions
Today is Giving Tuesday, a day of global giving back to the causes you care about. It’s a day when people around the world will be doing something to support the good causes they care about. As a reader of The New Humanitarian, we know that you care about quality journalism from the heart of crises.
We broke so many important stories this year. But our work isn’t done. As we compile our annual Ten Crises and Trends to Watch list for 2022, we can see that there’s never been a greater need for independent journalism covering crises.
We’ll be there, on the ground, reporting on issues like the economic fallout from the pandemic, youth unemployment and radicalisation, locally led peace efforts, and much more. It’s vital that we continue with our mission of putting quality, independent journalism at the service of the millions of people affected by humanitarian crises around the world.
But this work is expensive. Investigations can cost thousands of dollars. We can’t do what we do without the financial support of our donors and readers like you. This December, we’ll be launching a fundraising campaign so we can end the year in the strongest possible position, ready for 2022. You’ll hear about the campaign over email and on social media.
But you can get in early and show your support today, on Giving Tuesday, by making a regular contribution to our work and becoming a member of The New Humanitarian.
Please donate what you can.