The New Humanitarian Annual Report 2021

  1. Home
  2. Asia
  3. Nepal

Community forest value untapped

A woman walking along the main road connecting Jumla to nearby villages. Women here bear the brunt of physical tasks. Life expectancy is 50 years old.
(Natalie Bailey/IRIN)

Government oversight is preventing local communities from reaping economic benefits from forests they have spent decades re-generating, activists say. 

Communities “cannot make [the] best use of their available resources because of the restrictions imposed and a complicated process of getting approval for harvesting of any timber and non-timber forest products,” Ganga Ram Dahal of the Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI), a global coalition promoting forest land tenure reform, told IRIN.

The challenge is“safeguarding the rights” of communities, Bharat Pokharel, forester and deputy country programme director in Nepal for the Swiss development agency Helvetas, explained at a recent regional workshop on forestland tenure held in the capital, Kathmandu. 

Rehabilitating denuded forests

According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, heavy deforestation began in the 1950s due to politics, poor management and socio-economic pressures.

In 1964, forests covered more than 45 percent of Nepal’s total land area, while today that figure is closer to 29 percent, according to Nepal’s Department of Forest Research and Survey.

Despite this, many experts believe a trend of forest degradation is slowly being reversed through the involvement of local communities and the development of more sustainable policies. 

In the late 1980s, as part of a major conservation effort, the government began handing over some public forests to local communities for management, protection and utilization.

Today, community forestry covers 1.6 million hectares, or a quarter of all forestland in Nepal, mostly in the country’s mid-hills, which are squeezed between the mountainous north and the southern plains. Some 18,000 associations known as community forest user groups (CFUGs), made up of more than two million households, manage these areas. 

Unlocking forest potential

These CFUGs have contributed to significant improvements in forest growth, Helvetas reported in 2011. “But economic benefits to local communities are yet to be realized,” the organization’s forest tenure assessment said.

Initially, the main goal of CFUGs was to protect and rehabilitate depleted forests, supporting only the “subsistence needs” of communities, a 2009 paper in Nepal’s Journal of Forest and Livelihood indicated.
Communities were able to remove dying trees and cut branches for subsistence-level economic activity, such as selling firewood, but as the forests matured, their “full productive potential” went underutilized. 

As a result, the focus on conservation needs to shift, said Krishna Chandra Paudel, secretary at the Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, who calls for government-assisted commercialization of community forests. 

A boy and his father in Nepal's remote Jumla District

David Swanson/IRIN
A boy and his father in Nepal's remote Jumla District...
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Adaptation to climate change goes local
A boy and his father in Nepal's remote Jumla District...

Photo: David Swanson/IRIN
A father and son in remote Jumla

Power struggle

While many in the government argue that regulation is still needed to ensure the country does not backtrack on decades of forest rehabilitation, forest tenure experts say overly strict oversight threatens community rights.

Communities are supposed to be fully in charge of forest resources, but in practice all user-groups must inform district forest officers of timber sales and transport, and acquire advance transport approval at check posts, according to Anupama Mahat, a consultant at RRI. 

The government has also ordered a number of logging bans, curbing CFUG decision-making rights, said Suvas Devkota, executive director of the Federation of Community Forestry Users, Nepal (FECOFUN), a formal network of user-groups. 

More recently, the government proposed amendments to the Forest Act of 1993 that would reduce user-group autonomy, according to a 2012 policy note by the local think tank Forest Action. Many amendment provisions are intended to discourage timber sales, reducing community income from the forests and hampering local development, the paper said. 

Meanwhile, civil society’s opposition to the proposed amendments, as well as the recent dissolution of parliament following its failure to produce a draft constitution, have stalled further legislative action.

The Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation’s Paudel insists the government is not encroaching the autonomy of community groups, but is trying to prevent illegal logging, unsustainable lumber harvesting and overall corruption in forest management in order to preserve forests and livelihoods. 

The prospect of earning cash from “reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation”(REDD+) - a proposed mechanism under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change that aims to halt and reverse forest loss - has boosted the demand for more local rights. 

The currently stalled constitution-drafting process offers an opportunity to protect these rights with “strong legal instruments and, ultimately, a constitutional guarantee,” noted Mahat.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information:

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.