1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. Southern Africa
  4. Madagascar

A plan for moving from slash-and-burn to conservation

[Madagascar] Villagers in the remote northeast. [Jan 2006]
Villagers in Mahitsiarongana gather to hear the news (Lee Middleton/IRIN)

President Marc Ravalomanana's government has embarked on an ambitious national effort to protect Madagascar's remaining biodiversity while simultaneously reducing poverty and promoting rural development.

In September 2003 he announced his commitment to triple Madagascar's protected areas in five years at the World Parks Congress in Durban, South Africa. Christened "the Durban Vision", the plan would increase the country's protected habitats from 1.7 to 6 million hectares - or from 3 to 10 percent of the Indian Ocean nation's surface area.

Despite being renowned for its globally unique biodiversity, Madagascar has seen its forests reduced to only 10 percent of their original cover. With deforestation continuing at an annual rate of 2,000 km2 - largely to meet the livelihood needs of expanding rural populations - this protection pledge may have come just in time.

A three-day walk separates Mahitsiarongana village in Madagascar's remote northeast from the nearest town. Men, women and children trickle in from the bush to the village's muddy center - word of mouth has summoned them from the distant rice fields where the majority stay during the planting season.

The village president finally introduces the six conspicuously urban Malagasy who have arrived, saying, "They're here to help us manage the forest."

During the half-hour meeting the villagers are told the forest around their lands will soon be protected by something called the Makira Project, but are assured that they can remain in the area, and will have management rights to the forest they have used for generations.

Last month, the Ministry of Environment, Water and Forests (MINENVEF) signed off on the first Durban Vision sites, totalling a massive one million hectares. Another major success was the creation of the country's new System of Protected Areas of Madagascar, or SAPM, which redefines and simplifies the legal process used to create a protected area.

"I think that perhaps even more important that the million [ha] is the fact that after only two years we were able to create the SAPM. It's not 100 percent fixed, but now we have a clear procedure and legal basis in place. Without it things were much more difficult," said Lantoniaina Andriamampianina, Madagascar Terrestrial Programme Director of the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), a US-based NGO involved in the Durban Vision process.

Prior to SAPM, Madagascar's protected areas network was run by the national park service, ANGAP. It followed the classic national park model of protected areas in which tourism and/or research was allowed, but any type of extraction, much less habitation, was strictly prohibited.

Under the more flexible SAPM, varying degrees of sustainable resource use can be permitted in new sites, contributing to poverty reduction and sustainable development.

As the world's 11th poorest nation, with an illiteracy rate approaching 50 percent, Madagascar lacks the resources - both financial and human - to undertake the management of six million ha of new protected areas.

Illegal mining and logging head the list of commercial menaces, and a growing population's continued practice of the slash-and-burn agriculture that is responsible for most of Madagascar's deforestation means managers will have their hands full.

However, both MINENVEF and NGOs have high hopes of building capacity in rural communities, so that local people might take on a significant portion of the cost of management.

Communities and the government enter a legal contract in which community associations (called COBAs) are given management rights to important conservation areas. The COBAs agree to manage those areas according to conservation objectives, and in theory can profit from this agreement, whether indirectly through exclusive rights to important resources, or directly through activities such as ecotourism ventures, or selling permits to outsiders seeking to use resources.

In Mahitsiarongana the meeting to appoint leaders for the community's new COBA had adjourned. Opinions and understanding of what has occurred were mixed. Many claimed not to understand what was being discussed. When pressed, most said they know they're supposed to protect the forest, but when asked what that meant, many couldn't explain.

Serge Rajaobelina, executive secretary of FANAMBY, a national environmental NGO, acknowledged the difficulties of transferring management to communities.

"It would be a bit like asking you to fly a 747 tomorrow. We've got a long way to go ... we're trying to figure out the best ways to teach, train, and work with the communities; to find solutions and strategies both for the conservation issues and the development issues."

There is much to do before Madagascar can fulfil the ambitious commitment to both its natural heritage and its people. However, those leading the process appear realistic yet hopeful.

"The environment sector must take part in the fight against poverty. And not only environment - all the different sectors of government must find ways to work together," Jean Philippe Randrianantoandro, MINENVEF's focal point for the Durban Vision told IRIN.

"I'm sure the people would prefer to conserve the environment if given a choice - but it's a question of survival."

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.