The Supreme Court of Rwanda has confirmed incumbent President Paul Kagame the winner of the 25 August presidential elections in the country's first multiparty contest, the Rwanda News Agency (RNA) reported on Wednesday from the capital, Kigali.
"Presidential candidate Paul Kagame was voted President of the Republic ... with 3,544,777 votes, equalling 95.05 percent of total votes cast," Supreme Court Justice Louis Marie Mugyenzi was quoted as saying by RNA. Kagame was followed by his main challenger, Faustin Twagiramungu, with 134,865 votes (3.62 percent) and Jean Nepomuscene Nayinzira, with 49,634 votes (1.33 percent).
On Tuesday, the court dismissed a petition to nullify the polls filed by Twagiramungu, who made allegations of vote rigging, intimidation of his supporters, general violation of the electoral law and pressure on voters to choose Kagame. Twagiramungu also questioned the partiality of the National Electoral Commission (NEC) throughout the elections process.
"The petition is not backed by any evidence to support the accusations. We therefore dismiss this petition," Mugyenzi ruled.
In its ruling, the court said it had asked Twagiramungu to provide evidence to back his accusations before preliminary hearings could start. However, in a reply to the court on Monday, Twagiramungu said he would drop the case, although he asked the court to consider his "protest" before endorsing the election results.
According to RNA, the Supreme Court received no claims other than Twagiramungu's.
The EU observer mission of Rwanda's polls reported that although the election was a "positive step" for Rwanda's democratisation process, it was marred by "numerous election irregularities".
Kagame, 45, is scheduled to take his oath of office on 12 September.
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions
We uncovered the sex abuse scandal that rocked the WHO, but there’s more to do
We just covered a report that says the World Health Organization failed to prevent and tackle widespread sexual abuse during the Ebola response in Congo.
Our investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation triggered this probe, demonstrating the impact our journalism can have.
But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking.
We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.
The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and do more of this.