1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. DRC
  • News

ICG makes recommendations for peace

Crisisweb: the International Crisis Group - ICG logo ICG
The International Crisis Group
The International Crisis group (ICG) on Friday recommended to the Security Council that it maintain its pressure on Rwanda, Uganda, Zimbabwe and Angola to withdraw completely from the DRC - if necessary through encouraging reassessment of these countries’ qualification to receive military and financial aid, debt relief and trade privileges. It also suggested pressure on Uganda and Rwanda to have the rebel Congolese Liberation front (CLF) and Rassemblement congolais pour la democratie (RCD) they support improve human rights practices, respect freedoms of association and allow political parties and civil society groups meet the inter-Congolese talks facilitation team of Ketumile Masire. In addition, the ICG called for moves to have Kinshasa and its allies “immediately cease support of the ex-FAR [Forces armees rwandaises] and FDD [the Forces pour la defense de la democratie] factions, and to encourage the FDD to join the Burundi peace process.” Alongside this, it said, pressure should be brought to bear on Kinshasa “to immediately cease the repression” of people from the Kivus (eastern DRC) and Equateur (northwest DRC) in the territory it controls. All Lusaka agreement signatories should immediately stop supporting the so-called “negative forces” [Interahamwe, FDD, FNL, Congolese Mayi-Mayi militias, and others] and help the inter-Congolese dialogue by identifying key issues to be negotiated, the ICG report stated. They should also commence planning for a disarmament, demobilisation, resettlement and reintegration (DDRR) process, which it suggested should be undertaken by the UN Mission in the DRC (MONUC) on the instructions of the Security Council. Strict conditions on international assistance to the DRC must be enforced “to overcome the political resistance to an inter-Congolese dialogue” because failure to act now to support the DRC peace process would mean “a resumption of hostilities, a war of succession and further fragmentation of the country into semi-permanent spheres of military influence,” the ICG added. See full report athttp://www.intl-crisis-group.org/projects/project.cfm?subtypeid=5

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join