1. Home
  2. West Africa
  3. Nigeria

Focus on Government’s stand on Sharia

Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo said his government will not use the courts to halt the introduction of the Sharia Islamic penal code in northern Nigeria. In an interview with the BBC broadcast on Wednesday, he said full-blown Sharia - seemingly at odds with the country’s secular constitution - was an issue of fundamental human rights, but the government would not take a political position on the question. “What we are going through, what we are doing here, is a revolution of some sort and we expect that it will take some time before things settle,” he said. Nigeria’s independence constitution, approved by a panel of international Islamic jurists, allows states to incorporate Sharia, but only in the area of civil law. Rather than the amputations and floggings decreed by Sharia, under the current federal constitution, Islamic courts can only implement fines and prison sentences for Muslims contravening the tenants of the religion. But at the beginning of this year, three northern states introduced the Sharia penal code. Last week, a man’s hand was amputated in the northwestern state of Zamfara for stealing a cow, reigniting the Sharia controversy which threatens Nigeria’s stability and unity. Muslims argue that under the country’s new-found democracy, states have a right to respond to the demands of their citizens for Sharia law. Onyema Oguchukwu, a special advisor to Obasanjo, told IRIN that the federal government’s position was based on concern that if it condemned Sharia, “it would unite the whole of the north” in defence of Islam. “Dealing with Sharia involves two aspects - the legal aspect and the political aspect,” Ugochukwu said. “The legal aspect is for the Supreme Court to determine whether these new laws being made in some states contradict the constitution. One NGO has gone to court over the issue, which is as it should be. Every Nigerian has the responsibility to defend the constitution, not just to call on the president to do something. “The president has been reluctant to go to court because once you go to court, you close the other option, the option of a political solution. A legal action could last for years, and it wouldn’t be the best thing to tie the government down in court,” he added. Olisa Agbakoba, a human rights lawyer who has brought the legal challenge against the Zamfara state government over Sharia, said the constitutional issue has thrown up the question of the validity of the country’s unity. “Whether Obasanjo has the skills to manoeuvre Nigeria from the edge (of this crisis) is the central question,” he told IRIN.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join