The next phase of the so-called humanitarian reset is lurching forward.
Drained of funding but facing growing global needs, the conventional humanitarian sector will set out on the next steps of a reform plan dubbed “the reset”, UN relief chief Tom Fletcher said following a mini-summit of (some) aid leaders last week.
“Phase two”, as Fletcher is calling it, describes a slightly leaner version of today’s system, with a to-do list of past promises to be more collaborative, to listen better, and be more inclusive of local leadership.
The reset was intended in part as a collective reply from a system facing a Trump-worsened crisis of funding and legitimacy. But weeks of mostly closed-door discussions underline a vast gap in expectations – between those looking to retool the humanitarian system, and those looking to reimagine or remake it entirely.
Many humanitarians say they’re searching for deeper systemic transformation. Here are eight opinion and think pieces on reset and reform that might signpost the way forward:
“There are no quick fixes. But here are five ideas for change beyond the reset.”
“The problem is not what’s being proposed but who is being asked to deliver change. The leadership needed to navigate this crisis will have to come from elsewhere.”
“The choice is not between cynicism and radical reinvention. There is a middle path – a pragmatic, principled reform.”
“Six key actions countries can take – and should have taken a long time ago – if they are to liberate themselves from dependence on foreign aid.”
“Here’s the uncomfortable truth: If your humanitarian mission dies when the money dries up, it was never a mission, it was a business.”
“The formalised humanitarian system emerged from existing mutual aid, solidarity, and cooperation. But expansionist logic now dominates. Capitalist humanitarianism must be brought to heel for any meaningful change to emerge.”
“Budget cuts and dramatic restructuring aren’t going to cut it. The aid sector needs to understand its economic inefficiency problem.”
”Countries in the Global South must shift the framing on the future of aid. This can’t be done unless the twin issues of debt and taxes are addressed.”