A complex but critical issue is being raised at the UN climate change talks in Bonn, Germany: finding a scale that determines how vulnerable developing countries are to climate change, which will help allocating funds to adapt fairly.
Jan Kowalzig, of the UK-based development agency, Oxfam, told IRIN that the need for a vulnerability index would have to be agreed as a principle, because "it is the link between adaptation and the financing mechanism".
He said the idea should be accepted by all countries and included in the final global climate deal to be made in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December. It will become effective after 2012, when the first phase of the Kyoto Protocol, a treaty to cut greenhouse gas emissions, lapses.
Measuring vulnerability was raised on the third day of the Bonn talks by the representative of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the financial mechanism of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), who said the facility was examining a possible vulnerability index to fairly distribute resources.
GEF manages two special funds under the UNFCCC: the Least Developed Countries Fund, and the Special Climate Change Fund, which both disburse funds for adaptation projects.
But the big money is expected to come from the Adaptation Fund, also to be operated by GEF, which will raise money from a levy of about two percent on credits generated by the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) set up under the Kyoto Protocol.
The mechanism allows industrialized countries to earn and trade emission credits by implementing projects in developed countries or developing ones, and put the credits towards meeting their greenhouse gas emission targets.
can get extremely difficult: there could be debates for instance over
whether countries where large numbers of people are affected should be
"The principle is a good one, as you need a method to prioritize funding," said Saleemul Huq, head of the climate change group at the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), but there were several indices to choose from.
"It can get extremely difficult: there could be debates for instance over whether countries where large numbers of people are affected should be prioritised - like India - or a country like Tuvalu [a Pacific Ocean island], where the numbers are small but the country is extremely vulnerable to sea level rise."
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an international scientific body, said in its Fourth Assessment Report that the vulnerability of a society to climate change was influenced by its development path, physical exposures, distribution of resources, prior stresses, and social and government institutions.
"All societies have inherent abilities to deal with certain variations in climate, yet adaptive capacities are unevenly distributed, both across countries and within societies," the IPCC report pointed out.
Experts said the Environment Vulnerability Index (EVI) developed by the South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC), and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and their partners, could be used for the purpose.
The EVI uses 50 wide-ranging indicators, such as dry periods, high winds, conflicts and population, to identify the most important factors affecting the vulnerability of states, and to prioritise actions for the whole range of natural and human hazards that can affect the environment.
Ursula Kaly, who works on the index project, said the EVI had a sub-index for climate change. If this were used to measure a country's vulnerability, "it would not require any modification other than updating the data – the EVI was envisaged as being recalculated every five years, with the last calculation at the end of 2004."
What is vulnerability?
The 2007 Human Development Report of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) described "vulnerability" in the context of climate change as "an inability to manage risk without being forced to make choices that compromise human well-being over time."
The term "vulnerable" originates from a Latin word, meaning "to wound" either physically or emotionally.
The IIED's Huq said the debates on which of the many indices to use could take a political turn; Oxfam's Kowalzig commented that "these are technical issues, which can be dealt with after Copenhagen."
This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions
It was The New Humanitarian’s investigation with the Thomson Reuters Foundation that uncovered sexual abuse by aid workers during the Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of Congo and led the World Health Organization to launch an independent review and reform its practices.
This demonstrates the important impact that our journalism can have.
But this won’t be the last case of aid worker sex abuse. This also won’t be the last time the aid sector has to ask itself difficult questions about why justice for victims of sexual abuse and exploitation has been sorely lacking.
We’re already working on our next investigation, but reporting like this takes months, sometimes years, and can’t be done alone.
The support of our readers and donors helps keep our journalism free and accessible for all. Donations mean we can keep holding power in the aid sector accountable, and shine a light on similar abuses.