1. Home
  2. Southern Africa
  3. Angola

SADC team says government grip on electoral process too tight

Southern African Development Community - SADC logo [NEW] SADC
Six SADC countries are affected by food shortages

A team of parliamentarians from the Southern African Development Community Parliamentary Forum (SADC-PF) has expressed concern about the extent of political and ministerial control in Angola's electoral process.

The 21-member delegation was in the country from 19 to 24 March to observe the registration of voters and the prospects for holding legislative elections in 2008, followed by a presidential ballot in 2009.

"The registration process is starting on a good note and has been given the thumbs-up by civil society, nongovernmental organisations and the church groups," said Gobopang Duke Lefhoko, a Botswana Member of Parliament and mission leader of the SADC team.

However, Lefhoko criticised the fact that the electoral process, including registration, was being managed by a ministry. "In terms of SADC-PF, it is a concern that a ministry of government is running the process. We prefer that independent electoral management bodies should be charged with such responsibility."

According to an Interim Report by the SADC team, the ministry of territorial administration (MAT) is in charge of all the logistics for the preparation and organisation of elections in Angola.

MAT works with the Inter-ministerial Commission for Elections (CIPPE), which comprises MAT and two other ministries: those of the interior, and posts and telecommunications.

The National Electoral Commission (CNE) is supervising registration and managing the entire electoral process.

The SADC-PF team expressed unease about the 11 members of the CNE because nearly every member is a senior political actor. According to Lefhoko, the CNE in Angola is far from ideal and a national electoral commission should not involve any political actors at all.

Three CNE members are from the ruling Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA); two are from the second largest party, the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA); one is from the third largest party, the Party for Social Renewal (PRS); two more are chosen and appointed by Angolan President José Eduardo dos Santos; two others are from MAT and the ministry of social communication; and the final member, who is also the chair, is chosen by the courts, in this case the Vice-President of the Supreme Court.

"It's a huge concern when it comes to the SADC-PF norms and standards, because [the CNE] gives a clear bias to the incumbency in this case, and a couple of other parties that might be holding more seats in parliament," Lefhoko said. Parties with a smaller number of parliamentary seats are not represented in the electoral commission.

"Right from the process of registration, the management of everything electoral should be done by an independent body," Lefhoko commented.

But Angola's vice-minister of territorial administration, Luís de Assunção Pedro da Mota Liz, told IRIN that while the system might not be perfect, it was impartial. "First of all, you need to understand that MAT [ministry of territorial administration] is part of CIPPE [Inter-ministerial Commission for Elections]. The ministry [of territorial administration] does not have control over CNE or CIPPE. It is the other way around: they control the ministry," he said.

"Regarding the composition of the CNE, my own personal opinion is that it is a bit cumbersome; there are too many members, if you include those at provincial and municipal level. However, it is impartial. The people who make up the 11-member CNE were chosen for their impartiality. And, don't forget, we had to make it a consensual body to help create trust and to guarantee credibility. That's why we've included all the political parties," Mota Liz added.

What matters most at the next elections is that the Angolan people learn to trust the electoral process, said Mota Liz. In 1992, the first and last time multiparty elections were held, the polling process was never completed because war broke out halfway through the presidential election.

Nevertheless, the SADC-PF insists that transparency and accountability are key if the population is to trust the democratic process. The team has asked the Angolan government to clarify the appointment of the Vice-President of the Supreme Court as chair of the CNE, which could pose a conflict of interest.

According to Mota Liz, complaints about the judge are based on a small group of radical people: "There are those who think the judge should stop working while he is on the CNE, because they think that could make him partial. But the CNE is not a full-time job and, anyway, the Supreme Court doesn't have many judges, so they need him to keep working. Moreover, being a judge is in itself a position of impartiality."

The SADC team recommended that the Angolan government seriously consider separating the powers of the state, the government and the party "to avoid conflict of interest in resolving electoral disputes". In future, the Angolan government should consider using a single independent body to enhance transparency and avoid the confusion that exists in the current arrangement, in which both the ministry of territorial administration and the electoral commission are involved.

Mota Liz told IRIN that Angola would merge the Inter-ministerial Commission for Elections and the electoral commission after these elections had been successfully and peacefully concluded. "It is just this time around, the first time, that we have needed to have two bodies. The registration process is very difficult and it was important to have two bodies. In the future it will become easier and we will just have the CNE."

The SADC report also advised the government to publish an election date as soon as possible. "Angola is still in the group of countries where the election date is announced by the head of state at a convenient time; this is not in line with the Forum Norms and Standards for Elections in the SADC region. Keeping the date of elections a secret is not a good practice - it is alleged to disadvantage opposition political parties."

One member of the SADC delegation said they felt frustrated even before arriving in Angola because it had taken so many months to receive an invitation from the authorities in Luanda (the capital).

When they arrived, they were taken everywhere by officials, prompting one member to comment: "It has been the most controlled electoral observation trip I've ever been on in the region." Others expressed concern about the lack of interest by local journalists, "who don't ask any questions at all". The team will return later in the year.

lp/tdm/he


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join