1. Home
  2. Asia
  3. Nepal

Security still a challenge despite peace deal – leaders

With extortion, threats and intimidation still common in many parts of rural Nepal, security will remain a serious challenge for many months to come despite Wednesday’s landmark peace deal, political leaders said on Thursday.

“The Maoists have to create an environment free of fear for the people,” said Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala, who is also the chairman of Nepali Congress (NC), the country’s largest party. He added that a secure environment is needed to make the elections for the constituent assembly, scheduled for June 2007, successful.

In Wednesday’s peace agreement, Maoist rebels signed a comprehensive deal with the interim government of seven national parties to end the decade-long armed conflict, which has killed over 14,000 Nepalese.

For their part, Maoist leaders said that the situation regarding civilians caught up in the conflict would improve now that a peace deal had been signed. “We will become part of the government and no violence will be tolerated by our party,” Maoist leader Prachanda said.

But interim government members have yet to be convinced. “Even now, civilians live in total fear of the Maoists and it is time that they proved themselves as a political party,” said Pasupati Rana, chairman of the Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP), one of the country’s leading parties.

The Maoists, who had been waging an armed rebellion since 1996 against the Nepalese state, agreed to a mutual ceasefire with the government following the end of the absolute rule of the Nepalese monarch, King Gyanendra, in April after a mass uprising against him.

For the last 10 years, civilians have been subject to extra-judicial killings, forced disappearances, torture and widespread internal displacement at the hands of both the Maoists and government forces, according to Insec, a prominent Nepalese human rights organisation.

The rebel leader added that his movement had agreed to the contentious issue of management of their arms and ammunition and that this was a clear move to build bridges with civilians who may have suffered during the civil war.

nn/sc/jl

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join