At least three demonstrators killed, 50 injured

At least three protestors were killed and at least 50 injured at the hands of the security forces on Thursday afternoon during demonstrations in Nepal’s capital, Kathmandu, according to the Himalayan Human Rights (HimRights), a local rights group. In total, 14 demonstrators have been killed and over 3,500 injured since the nationwide strike and pro-democracy rallies against Nepal’s absolute ruler King Gyanendra began 15 days ago, another local rights group, Insec, said. The protests, led by the seven main opposition parties, have gathered pace since 5 April, with almost 2.5 million Nepalis coming out to demonstrate. The king assumed direct rule on 1 February, 2005, after suspending the democratic government led by former prime minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, citing his failure to quell the ongoing Maoist insurgency against the state, which has already claimed the lives of more than 13,000 over the past decade. To foil the largest rally to date planned in the capital, the royal government imposed an 18-hour curfew. But, defying government orders, nearly 100,000 demonstrators took to the streets with anti-king banners. Even the United Nations Office of the High Commission for Human Rights (OCHCR) in Nepal was denied curfew passes - thus preventing monitors from observing what was happening. “The authorities told us that we can have limited movement between our residences and office, and insisted that this can only take place under police arrest,” said Kieran Dwyer, spokesperson for OCHCR-Nepal, adding that their office was not allowed to deploy its human rights monitors in the capital during the curfew. So far, only five local human rights activists were able to reach the main demonstration sites in the capital by taking huge risks as none of them were issued with curfew passes. “The security forces threatened to shoot us if we didn’t leave at once,” said activist Sukaram Maharjan from HimRights, shocked by the direct threat from a group of armed police. Meanwhile, no journalists were given curfew passes, but many continued to go out at great personal risk after the authorities were ordered to shoot on sight anyone who defied the government’s curfew orders. As an added consequence of the curfew, even those needing emergency medical assistance were not allowed to leave their homes. “The policeman told me to wait for another day to take my daughter to hospital,” said a local resident, whose 7-year-old daughter was seriously ill. Desperate to take his daughter to hospital, he had called the government’s emergency line to plead for help, but his call was in vain.