The New Humanitarian Annual Report 2021

  1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. West Africa
  4. Mauritania

Fatwa alone will not stop FGM/C

[Sudan] In Sudan, as in many parts of the Arab world of the Middle East, the true extent of FGM is not known . The practise is shrouded in secrecy and confidentiality in societies that are traditionally resistant to cultural change.
Tradition and beliefs perpetuate female genital mutilation/cutting (file photo) (Ben Parker/UNICEF)

A recent fatwa banning female genital mutilation/cutting in Mauritania will help reduce the practice only if religious leaders take the message to the people, scholars and anti-FGM/C activists say.

Given the widespread practice of FGM/C in Mauritania and the belief that it is imposed by Islam – families cut their girls “as Allah wishes", one woman said upon hearing of the fatwa – convincing people to stop will take time and engagement from religious leaders.

“Imams and Muslim scholars must not stop at just talking about the ban in their sermons,” Muslim scholar Baba ould Mata told IRIN. “They must go before the people, especially in remote regions where FGM/C is prevalent.”

A group of Muslim clerics and scholars on 12 January signed the religious decree against FGM/C after two days of debate led by the Forum de la pensee islamique et du dialogue des cultures in the capital Nouakchott.

A 2007 Health Ministry study showed that 72 percent of women in Mauritania had undergone FGM/C – about the same proportion as in 2001 despite years of awareness campaigns and a 2005 law punishing anyone cutting a child and “causing injury”.

But education campaigns did help bring about the fatwa, religious heads said. The Muslim leaders issuing the decree drew on a 2008 declaration by Mauritanian doctors and midwives that FGM/C is “harmful to health and can have grave consequences including death”.

In 2006 a Mauritanian association of Islamic scholars issued a fatwa denouncing FGM/C but few religious leaders agreed to sign it. The 2008 declaration put more weight behind the move this time, Muslim scholar and secretary general of the forum, Cheikh ould Zein told IRIN.

He said of the recent fatwa: “Our reasoning went like this: Are there texts in the Koran that clearly require this practice? No. On the contrary, Islam is clearly against any act that would have negative repercussions for health. Today Mauritanian doctors unanimously declare [FGM/C] threatens health; therefore it is against Islam.”

But many Mauritanians, like one in Nouakchott who gave her name just as Fatimatou, say they cut because Islam requires it. “We practice this from generation to generation as Allah wishes,” she told IRIN. “A girl who is not cut cannot pray or get married.”

She asked several times for confirmation of the fatwa then said: “I have my doubts. I am going to ask about this in the village; we have a marabout [religious leader] there.”

Fatimatou, pregnant with her third child, added: “But if the child I’m carrying is a girl, I think I’ll have her cut because I don’t want her to have a bad life.”

Ould Zein said FGM/C is too often seen as required by Islam. “The difficulty is separating tradition from religion.”

Given “the weight of tradition” scholar ould Mata told IRIN, hearing of FGM/C’s harmful effects from NGOs will not be enough. “Though if an imam goes to a village and says, ‘Yes, Islam is against FGM/C’, men and women can no longer defend the practice with a religious argument.”

Mauritanian law has had little effect on the ground, said Yakhare Soumaré with the Mauritanian NGO Action. She agreed that the fatwa can have influence only if religious leaders actively promote it. “It has been the position of many religious leaders up to now that was the greatest obstacle to our awareness efforts. Even if our campaigns reach remote populations, it is always the religious leaders who have the last word.”


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information:

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.