1. Home
  2. IRIN Blog
  • News

The marginalization of lubricant

On Valentines Day, happy couples all over the world will be cozying up, dimming the lights and turning on Marvin Gaye - much to the chagrin of their single counterparts everywhere. But what if - when the moment is just right - the unthinkable happens?

Your partner slides on a condom, only to spit on it! That "moment" will pack its toothbrush and disappear out the door.

According to a study published in the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (JAIDS) this month, almost 90 percent of men who have sex with men (MSM) have resorted to using their own saliva as a lubricant in the absence of conventional water-based varieties – nearly one-quarter of them while practicing what would otherwise be safe sex. It's not a pretty thought.

When used with latex condoms, water-based lubricants like Astroglide and KY Jelly can help prevent condom breakage and thus aid the prevention of HIV transmission.

Saliva, when used as a lubricant, may not be sufficient to protect the condom from friction and tears, and may even present a vector for the transmission of diseases like Hepatitis B.

So, if a quarter of these men were striving to protect themselves by using a condom, why would they not also get lube? And now that I think of it, when last were you handed a free condom and lube?

If whole groups of people can be marginalised, then maybe safer sex strategies can be too – the female condom, lubricant. Some go out of fashion, but others - like lubricant – never even made it onto the mainstream catwalks of our sex lives. Why? Because conventional wisdom says lubricant means anal sex, and anal sex is the kind of sex that is, well, still a long way from that catwalk.

In short, anal sex is still "a gay thing". Or is it?

A survey by the US Centres for Disease Control in 2002 said that about 40 percent of straight men and 35 percent of straight woman reported having had anal sex by their mid-40s.

So then, lubricant = anal sex = ? This Valentine's Day, maybe it's time we rethink the equation, and some of our misconceptions.

llg/kn

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join