1. Home
  2. East Africa
  3. Eritrea

Border commission accuses Ethiopia of undermining peace

The independent boundary commission has accused Ethiopia of "appearing to undermine" the peace process with Eritrea by seeking variations to the delimited border line. In its latest report, the Hague-based Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) noted that both sides had been invited to put forward "technical" comments on the finalised border map, which was submitted to the parties in December. It noted that Ethiopia's response went "far beyond the scope" of comments on the map. "The main thrust of the Ethiopian comments is that the boundary should be varied so as to take better account of human and physical geography," the report stated. The ruling on the new border between the two countries was issued by the EEBC on 13 April 2002, in a decision deemed "final and binding", and which both Ethiopia and Eritrea agreed to abide by in the Algiers peace agreement of December 2000. The peace accord put an end to a bitter two-year border war, sparked by a skirmish in the village of Badme which has now become symbolic for both countries. Addis Ababa and Asmara both claim they have been awarded Badme and Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi warned recently there would be "problems" if the village went to Eritrea. In its report, the EEBC stressed it did not have the power to change the April decision and vary the border. The only way this could be considered was with the agreement of both parties, it said. "Notwithstanding the clarity with which the Commission has stated the limits upon its authority, Ethiopia has continued to seek variations to the boundary line delimited in the April Decision, and has done so in terms that appear, despite protestations to the contrary, to undermine not only the April Decision but also the peace process as a whole," the report stated. "It may be regrettable, but it is by no means unusual, for boundary delimitation and subsequent demarcation to divide communities," it noted. The Commission expressed "disquiet" over statements made by Ethiopia that it "will not adhere to the April Decision if its claim to 'refinement' of the April Decision delimitation is not accepted". The report also expressed concern over protection of Commission personnel involved in the demarcation process and urged the UN peacekeeping force (UNMEE) to support any protection given by Ethiopia and Eritrea. "It hardly needs saying that any assault on Boundary Commission personnel would likely lead to an immediate withdrawal of such personnel, the cessation of the demarcation process and the consequent frustration of the whole boundary demarcation process," it warned. According to the latest timetable issued by the Commission, the physical positioning of the border pillars is set to begin in July in the eastern sector.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join