1. Home
  2. East Africa
  3. Eritrea

Rights group says border ruling "favourable" to Eritrea

[Eritrea] Aerial view of Badme where the war flared up. IRIN
Disputed Badme

The international advocacy group, Human Rights Watch (HRW), has said that a crucial boundary ruling last year rejected many of Ethiopia’s claims to territory after its war with Eritrea.

Both countries claimed to have been awarded the symbolic village of Badme where their border war flared up in 1998, after a ruling issued by an international Boundary Commission in April 2002.

"The report [by the Boundary Commission] generally rejected Ethiopia's claims including (without mentioning it by name) the claim to the village of Badme where the war had started," HRW said in its 2003 World Report.

But, according to diplomatic sources, Ethiopia is currently preparing a comprehensive legal challenge to the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) ruling.

In its section on Eritrea, HRW said the Commission "gave a ruling favourable to Eritrea".

"Although the exact boundary between the two countries was still to be demarcated, many of the most intensively-disputed areas would fall on the Eritrean side of the border," the rights group said.

However, it called into question human rights issues in both countries.

Eritrea, it said, "remained a country under siege - from its own government".

"Nine years after Eritrea obtained its independence, no institutions existed to restrain government abuses, and presidential rule by decree continued unfettered," it said. A group of 11 government dissidents, arrested in September 2001, were still in jail and the private press remained closed.

In Ethiopia, human rights conditions "did not perceptibly improve" in 2002 and in the south, they "significantly worsened", the report said. It cited police shooting into groups of civilians and conducting mass arrests.

“Political parties were permitted to exist but their activities were sometimes hindered, especially at local levels,” it noted.

It went on to state that the international community had poured in funding to help the country develop, but turned a blind eye to human rights violations "preferring to support Ethiopia's fragile, relative peace in a troubled region and not wishing to jeopardize Ethiopia's cooperation in fighting terrorism".


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Our ability to deliver compelling, field-based reporting on humanitarian crises rests on a few key principles: deep expertise, an unwavering commitment to amplifying affected voices, and a belief in the power of independent journalism to drive real change.

We need your help to sustain and expand our work. Your donation will support our unique approach to journalism, helping fund everything from field-based investigations to the innovative storytelling that ensures marginalised voices are heard.

Please consider joining our membership programme. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful impact on how the world responds to crises.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join