Some 60,000 asylum seekers sent back by the United States to Mexico until their claims can be heard in US courts face a longer wait in Mexican limbo after the US Supreme Court issued an order on Wednesday that allowed a controversial anti-immigration policy to stand.
An appeals court in San Francisco had ruled that the policy – officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols, but known as “Remain in Mexico” – was unlawful in the two states under its jurisdiction: Arizona and California.
The ruling had been due to come into effect on Thursday, but the new order means asylum seekers must now pin their hopes on the outcome of an expected formal appeal by President Donald Trump’s administration, but that might not play out through the courts until early 2021.
Critics and rights advocates accuse the Trump administration of sending tens of thousands of mostly Honduran and Guatemalan asylum seekers – Mexicans and children are exempt – back into harm’s way, as many end up in crowded border camps or dangerous northern cities.
For more on how US and Mexican migration policies are affecting asylum seekers from Central America, read our recent briefing.
– Andrew Gully
Help make quality journalism about crises possible
The New Humanitarian is an independent, non-profit newsroom founded in 1995. We deliver quality, reliable journalism about crises and big issues impacting the world today. Our reporting on humanitarian aid has uncovered sex scandals, scams, data breaches, corruption, and much more.
Our readers trust us to hold power in the multi-billion-dollar aid sector accountable and to amplify the voices of those impacted by crises. We’re on the ground, reporting from the front lines, to bring you the inside story.
We keep our journalism free – no paywalls – thanks to the support of donors and readers like you who believe we need more independent journalism in the world. Your contribution means we can continue delivering award-winning journalism about crises. Become a member of The New Humanitarian today.