In the news: US Supreme Court allows ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy to stand

For tens of thousands of Central American asylum seekers, Wednesday’s order means a much longer wait in harm’s way.

The Supreme Court of the United States. (Claire Anderson/Unsplash)

Some 60,000 asylum seekers sent back by the United States to Mexico until their claims can be heard in US courts face a longer wait in Mexican limbo after the US Supreme Court issued an order on Wednesday that allowed a controversial anti-immigration policy to stand.

An appeals court in San Francisco had ruled that the policy – officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols, but known as “Remain in Mexico” – was unlawful in the two states under its jurisdiction: Arizona and California.

The ruling had been due to come into effect on Thursday, but the new order means asylum seekers must now pin their hopes on the outcome of an expected formal appeal by President Donald Trump’s administration, but that might not play out through the courts until early 2021.

Critics and rights advocates accuse the Trump administration of sending tens of thousands of mostly Honduran and Guatemalan asylum seekers – Mexicans and children are exempt – back into harm’s way, as many end up in crowded border camps or dangerous northern cities.

For more on how US and Mexican migration policies are affecting asylum seekers from Central America, read our recent briefing.

– Andrew Gully

Share this article

Support The New Humanitarian

Your support helps us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Donate