1. Home
  2. West Africa
  3. Nigeria

Darfur talks deadlocked over no-fly zone

[Sudan] Malnutrition and disease are on the rise. Displaced mother and child in al-Junaynah, Western Darfur, July 2004. IRIN
There is fear of diseases outbreak and rise in malnutrition at Kalma IDP camp, South Darfur, if aid agencies do not resume humanitarian operations.
Peace talks in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, between the Sudanese government and rebels from the western region of Darfur were deadlocked over a proposal to create a no-fly zone in the troubled area, delegates and mediators said. A draft security protocol prepared by African Union (AU) mediators provides for “an effective ceasefire on land and air”, requiring the Sudan government to end all military flights in Darfur. The two rebel movements fighting the government for the past 20 months in Darfur - the Sudanese Liberation Army (SLA) and the Justice and Equity Movement (JEM) – have agreed to sign the document. Khartoum has not. Majzoub Khalifa, head of the Sudanese government delegation, told reporters in Abuja on Saturday that the no-fly provision was not acceptable to Khartoum. He demanded a return to the previous draft, which did not include ending military flights in Darfur. Both the SLA and the JEM have said they are ready to sign the draft agreement. JEM spokesman Ahmed Hussain Adam accused the government of “wasting our time”. The AU’s chief mediator, Allam-Mi Ahmad, acknowledged on Saturday that the talks were on the brink of failure. “We have done everything possible trying to reconcile the different positions,'' Ahmad said. Mediators will persist for another week at the most, he said, and then suspend the talks if there is no breakthrough. Two previous rounds of talks between the belligerents failed to yield an agreement. The rebels have often claimed that government forces continue to carry out air attacks on their positions in breach of an existing ceasefire. The government has denied the claims and accused the rebels of attacking government positions. Indigenous communities in Darfur took up arms in February 2003, accusing Khartoum of decades of neglect and oppression. In its efforts to pacify the region, President Omar El Beshir’s government is widely believed to have backed the Janjawid, an Arab militia accused of committing atrocities against unarmed civilians. The conflict has displaced more than 1.5 million people, while more than 70,000 have died from the sickness and malnutrition it has caused. An unknown number have died as a direct result of the fighting itself. Disagreement over the security agreement has blocked the signing of a humanitarian protocol agreed at earlier talks in Abuja. The protocol aims to open up Darfur for a massive international relief intervention to save the many lives at risk there.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join