Been enjoying our Fixing Aid podcast? We'd love to hear from you!

  1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. Southern Africa
  4. South Africa

Inequality a threat to social stability

[South Africa] Many South Africans live in poverty
The budget included extra funds for free water and electricity for the very poor (IRIN)

Ten years after democracy, pervasive poverty and inequality characterise South Africa, according to a recent study.

The report, 'Poverty and Inequality in South Africa 2004-2014', focused on current trends and future policy options in narrowing the economic divide. Compiled by various academics as part of a study by the Ecumenical Foundation of Southern Africa (EFSA), it argues that social stability is at risk because of growing inequality.

"The single most important issue facing South Africa 10 years after the transition to democracy is breaking the grip of poverty on a substantial portion of its citizens. There is a consensus amongst most economic and political analysts that approximately 40 percent of South Africans are living in poverty - with the poorest 15 percent in a desperate struggle to survive," the study noted.

"This means that approximately 18 million out of 45 million people have not experienced the benefits of our newly found freedom. This poses a moral challenge to all South Africans - to work together towards the economic and social integration of the poorer section of our fellow citizens."

The researchers added that "in public discourse the two [issues] - poverty and inequality - are normally linked and treated as an expression of the same problem. In reality, they are very different".

These differences have important public policy consequences: inequality is reflected by the Gini coefficient, which measures the distribution of a country's national income. "In a perfectly equal society 10 percent of the population will receive 10 percent of the income; 20 percent of the population will receive 20 percent of income, and so on. For such a society the Gini coefficient will be zero," the study explained.

The Gini coefficient varies between 0 and 1 - the closer to 1, the more unequal a society; the closer to 0, the more equal a society. The Gini score for South Africa is about 0,6.

"With Brazil, South Africa has one of the most unequal income distributions in the world. This overall figure, however, hides a particular aspect: the Gini is higher amongst African [black] households than amongst non-African households. This is the result of some African households improving their position - a process that started in the 1990s, but accelerated after 1994", when the country became a democracy.

It "is important to note that a society with low levels of poverty may still be unequal; low poverty and inequality may co-exist. That is one of the reasons inequality cannot simply be equated with poverty. They are different phenomena," the report said.

In terms of poverty, South Africa could be referred to as a "45/55" society. By using the minimum living level (MLL) of a monthly income of R1,489 per household of 4.7 people - rather than the more common US $1-a-day poverty measure, due to the fluctuating currency exchange rates and recent dollar weakness - "about 45 percent of the population live in poverty and 55 percent do not".

The researchers explained that while this ratio was high, "unlike the Gini coefficient, it is not one of the highest in the world". Comparisons of poverty levels are risky, but "several countries have higher percentages of the population living in poverty than South Africa", according to the World Bank Global Poverty Monitor.

Although poverty has to some extent been "rolled back" - the proportion of people living in poverty has declined since 1970, for example - there has been rising inequality in income distribution.

This has created the notion of "two economies" in one country, a concern raised several times by President Thabo Mbeki. The first economy is prosperous, skilled and largely white, while the second is poor, unskilled and largely black.

An estimated 1.6 million "sustainable jobs" were created between 1995 and 2002. The state aims to create 1 million temporary and intermittent jobs through its Expanded Public Works Programme over the next five years, at a total cost of R15.5 billion.

However, "over the same period that 1.6 million jobs were created, more than 5 million people entered the labour market. That resulted in an increase in the number of unemployed of more than 3 million - meaning South Africa has an unemployment rate ... of about 40 percent", which underlined the need to make economic growth the "top priority".

The report noted that "not all poor [people] will be absorbed into the formal or even the informal economy", and stressed the need for a social safety net to alleviate the worst poverty, saying, "it is, in fact, being implemented systematically with the children's grant and increased old-age pensions, school feeding programmes and extended health services".

EFSA executive director Dr Renier Koegelenberg told IRIN that a policy shift to "developmental interventions, rather than welfare interventions", was needed.

"A substantial portion of the population falls between the lines of the public programmes at the moment. We are negotiating with the state ... to find a new deal for integrating people excluded from the normal economy. Unless we have a long-term policy to address these people not being picked up in the in normal, formal economy, we cannot increase social stability," Koegelenberg concluded.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information:

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.