The New Humanitarian Annual Report 2021

  1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. West Africa
  4. Côte d’Ivoire

Political storm clouds gather, but frontline remains quiet

[Cote d'Ivoire] MPCI fighters in Bouake.
The rebel fighters in Bouake. (IRIN)

The UN-led committee which monitors the peace process in Cote d'Ivoire, held a crisis meeting on Wednesday night, 24 hours after rebels occupying the north of the country announced that they were suspending their participation in a broad-based government of national reconciliation and putting on hold plans to disarm.

Military sources said the rebel decision had not resulted in any increase in tension along the frontline, where 5,300 French and West African peace-keeping troops are deployed to keep the two sides apart.

The government army closed the main road leading to the rebel capital Bouake to northbound traffic for a few hours, but it was reopened later, they added.

The rebels said on Tuesday they were withdrawing their nine ministers from the broad-based coalition government of independent Prime Minister Seydou Diarra because President Laurent Gbagbo had not delegated to it the powers agreed in a French-brokered peace agreement signed in January.

Gbagbo replied with a stream of insults against both Diarra's government and the rebels. Hardline "Young Patriot" vigilante groups which support the president called demonstrations against the rebels in Abidjan next week.

Gbagbo, whose Ivorian Popular Front (FPI) party has seven seats in Diarra's cabinet, said the nine rebel ministers would not be missed. He said in remarks televised on Tuesday night: "We have a team of 40 people, but there are only five or six or at the most 10 ministers who really work and make the government move forward."

He went on to compare the rebels, who have occupied the northern half of Cote d'Ivoire since civil war broke out in September last year, to houseboys living in their master's house and abusing his property.

But despite this war of words, diplomats and senior military officers in the peacekeeping force said they thought the rebels were simply making a political point.

In particular, they said, the rebels wanted the international community to press Gbagbo to let Diarra's government have more authority. They also wanted to put pressure on donors to provide more generous support for rebel fighters when they eventually lay down their guns.

"We think it's posturing, but we could be wrong," one senior military observer of the peace process said. "I think they are on the hook. I can't see them leaving. I would be very surprised if they did."

"This is a political problem rather than a military one and we need to come up with a political solution to it," he told IRIN.

A senior officer in the French peacekeeping force agreed. "This situation of blockage should not last more than a week," he predicted.

Military sources highlighted the fact that command and control structures within the rebel forces were very weak and senior commanders often found it virtually impossible to make warlords controlling particular regions follow their instructions. The rebel leaders therefore needed stronger incentives to persuade their recalcitrant field commanders to disarm and allow the government to restore its rule to the rebel-held north, they added.


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join