1. Home
  2. Africa
  3. West Africa
  4. Chad

Darfur’s forgotten refugees

Six year old Sadya (second from left) plays with her siblings and neighbours. She was born in Djabal refugee camp in Eastern Chad and has never set foot in her native Sudan
(Pierre Peron/OCHA)

Ten years after fleeing violence in the Sudanese region of Darfur, Abdulla Juma Abubakr has no intention of returning home.

After leaving the West Darfur town of El-Geneina in 2002, he first spent two years in a border camp inside Sudan, before moving on to Djabal, a refugee camp in eastern Chad’s Goz-Beida region.

“From what I saw when we left, the way people were killed, mosques burnt… I can’t imagine going back,” Abubakr, a refugee leader at the camp, told IRIN. “I know that other people are going back but I can’t go back. I still have some family members in Darfur but I can’t be sure of my security if I return.”

Many of the camp’s 18,000 refugees, most of them from Darfur, are also reluctant to return home. “The Darfur refugees have put many conditions towards return - security and recovery of property and land and other things,” Aminata Gueye, the representative of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) in Chad, told IRIN.

“We were working on a tripartite mechanism with respect to possible repatriation, but as long as the situation is not good they will not return. We were hoping in 2013 to facilitate the returns of some refugees, mainly the Masaliet.” The Masaliet are a non-Arab ethnic group found in parts of Sudan and Chad.

“We always hope for return because this is our first durable solution. The second is resettlement, but it is always blocked by political considerations,” added Gueye. 

Since 2009 and the thawing of relations between Chad and Sudan, the Darfur conflict has switched from western to eastern Darfur, allowing some pockets of stability to appear in West Darfur, Jérôme Tubiana, an independent researcher, told IRIN. “Some returns of both IDPs [internally displaced persons] and refugees have happened in those pockets, but they are often temporary because the security is still very unstable.”
Darfur at present has an estimated 1.7 million IDPs registered in camps while Eastern Chad is hosting an estimated 264,000 Sudanese refugees.

Every week, some of the refugees go home and then return, Saudi Hassan, the head of the Goz Beida office of the national commission dealing with IDPs and refugees (CNARR), told IRIN. “They have real-time information; around 95 percent of them do not want to go back. They say that their land has been occupied by unknown persons, there lacks infrastructure in the original homes compared to the refugee camps, there are still some IDP sites in Darfur, and they ask, ‘how can we then go back home?’”


Since 2010, Darfur has all but vanished from the international agenda, notes a July report, entitled Forgotten Darfur: Old Tactics and New Players, by Small Arms Survey. “While several parts of Darfur have become demonstrably more peaceful since 2009 - particularly as the geography of conflict has shifted eastwards away from West Darfur and the Sudan-Chad border - late 2010 and the first half of 2011 saw a significant offensive by the Sudan Armed Forces and militias.” 

The offensives, says the report, have been backed by airstrikes and aerial bombardments, targeting the rebel groups and the Zaghawa civilian population across much of eastern Darfur.
Darfur first experienced major fighting between 2003 and 2005, with Arab-dominated abbala (camel-herding) militia attacking non-Arab groups accused of supporting an anti-government rebellion there, the report said. But “the ‘new’ war in eastern Darfur, which erupted in late 2010 and early 2011, has pitted non-Arab groups against other non-Arabs; specifically, government-backed militias drawn from small, previously marginalized non-Arab groups - including the Bergid, Berti, and Tunjur - deployed against Zaghawa rebel groups and communities.”

A friendly game of cards between Sudanese refugees in Goz Amir camp in Eastern Chad

Pierre Peron/OCHA
A friendly game of cards between Sudanese refugees in Goz Amir camp in Eastern Chad
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Darfur’s forgotten refugees
A friendly game of cards between Sudanese refugees in Goz Amir camp in Eastern Chad

Photo: Pierre Peron/OCHA
The refugees have put many conditions towards return key among them security

Back in eastern Chad’s Djabal camp, the Darfur refugees are feeling increasingly forgotten, Abubakr told IRIN. “When we came [into the camp] in the first and second years, there was a lot of attention on us. Now we do not receive visitors; it seems like no one cares. Before, organizations came and started schools then…we were told the basic schools were ours to manage, now there is no pre-school in the camp. 

“When we came, all refugees were vulnerable, now to get non-food support, they chose the most vulnerable as if the rest of us have jobs,” he said.

Sudanese refugee children face other risks, as well. “Sudanese refugee children are not receiving birth certificates while the ones from CAR [the Central African Republic] do,” UNHCR’s Gueye said. “These children did not choose to be born in the country.” A lack of birth certificates means that the children may not be able to sit for exams - when they go back home, they may also not be recognized there, she explained. 

The Sudanese refugee children are being issued birth declarations, which are not recognized documents, but advocacy efforts are underway for them to get birth certificates, said CNARR. 

Access to conventional justice for the refugees due to cultural issues is also a problem, according to UNHCR. For example, among the refugees there is the payment of ‘dadia’, a fine imposed when violence leads to death; if someone cannot pay, then they are killed together with their family. Efforts at introducing mobile courts have been complicated by the harsh living conditions in the refugee areas, with civil servants and lawyers reluctant to work there. Threats against staff have also left many cases pending.

Affected by the food crisis

The ongoing Sahel food crisis has not spared the refugee population either. Refugees in parts of eastern Chad rely mainly on humanitarian aid, a full ration of 2,100 Kcals from the UN World Food Programme through UNHCR, without farming opportunities, while those in the south have access to land for cultivation and receive a half ration. 

“This has reflected in their current nutrition status with GAM [global acute malnutrition] rates higher in the east than in the [southern] camps, with the exception of Dosseye camp,” said Prosper Kabi Dibidibi, UNHCR Chad’s senior public health officer.

Meanwhile, the refugees in eastern Chad, as elsewhere, are seen as better-off than host communities in the remote regions where the camps are located. “If you compare the refugees to the hosts and the IDPs, the refugees are doing better than the rest of the group, they are not really the most affected by the food insecurity in the region,” said CNARR’s Hassan.

But this year, UNHCR resources for Chad have been drastically reduced and could reduce further in 2013, Gueye said. “When the plan to respond [to the Sahel crisis] was put up, they did not include the refugees because they said UNHCR is there. There is a need for a harmonized response to the crisis; the refugees should not be left out of any response.”


This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article
Join the discussion

Right now, we’re working with contributors on the ground in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries to tell the stories of people enduring and responding to a rapidly evolving humanitarian crisis.

We’re documenting the threats to humanitarian response in the country and providing a platform for those bearing the brunt of the invasion. Our goal is to bring you the truth at a time when disinformation is rampant. 

But while much of the world’s focus may be on Ukraine, we are continuing our reporting on myriad other humanitarian disasters – from Haiti to the Sahel to Afghanistan to Myanmar. We’ve been covering humanitarian crises for more than 25 years, and our journalism has always been free, accessible for all, and – most importantly – balanced. 

You can support our journalism from just $5 a month, and every contribution will go towards our mission. 

Support The New Humanitarian today.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.