This week, a long-awaited military offensive began against a Rwandan rebel group based in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. It had been planned as a joint operation between Congolese government forces and a unique combat unit of United Nations peacekeepers. But by the time the gunfire began on Tuesday, the partnership had broken down and the UN had been side-lined.
On Thursday, the UN mission in DRC, known as MONUSCO, tweeted: “The #FARDC [DRC army] is carrying out the operation alone after rejecting support from #MONUSCO.” How did it come to this?
Politics and human rights
Two UN Security Council resolutions as well as regional political groupings called for the DRC’s army (FARDC) and the Force Intervention Brigade (FIB) of the MONUSCO peacekeeping force to take “decisive military action” against the rebel Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) if the group failed to surrender and disarm by 2 January, 2015. The FIB is the only UN force globally with a mandate to go on the offensive against rebel groups.
A week after that deadline expired with little sign of compliance, Martin Kobler, the head of MONUSCO and the UN secretary-general’s special representative in DRC, said he was “very impressed by the high level of preparedness and the team spirit that reigns between the FARDC and the MONUSCO. I am confident about the engagement of the troops in the upcoming operations against the FDLR.”
But no operations began.
Then on 26 January, DRC President Joseph Kabila announced a military reshuffle that saw General Fall Sikabwe take command of the 34th military region, which includes the areas where FDLR is active. Kabila also put General Bruno Mandevu in charge of the operation against the FDLR.
Because these two generals reportedly appear on a MONUSCO “red list” on account of human rights abuses allegedly committed by units under their command, the UN reconsidered its role. The nominations “presented a real problem for us,” the head of UN peacekeeping, Hervé Ladsous said on 2 February.
According to several media reports, the UN called for these nominations to be reversed, something the government flatly rejected.
— MONUSCO (@MONUSCO) February 26, 2015
Monusco claimed that the FARDC rejected their backing
No details of the two generals’ alleged involvement in human rights abuses have been released and several senior FARDC officers told IRIN they were puzzled by Mandevu’s inclusion on the red list. Some noted that MONUSCU had worked with Sikabwe before, albeit under a waiver of his red list status.
Neighbouring Rwanda, whose government the FDLR would like to oust, accused the UN of politically-motivated procrastination.
The collapse of the DRC-UN partnership became more evident on 29 January, when a new plan for the anti-FDLR operation presented by chief of staff Didier Etumba excluded the FIB entirely, with MONUSCO elements providing only logistical support.
There are at least three theories circulating about this breakdown in relations. The first is the FARDC is not really dedicated to neutralising FDLR, the second is it doesn’t want to share credit for an eventual victory. The third is that the breakdown is part of DRC’s simmering discontent with the UN mission and the wider international community.
This third theory was lent credence by a long and indignant government communiqué issued on 16 February, a day after Kabila upbraided foreign ambassadors for meddling in the sovereign affairs of the DRC.
There is a long history of collusion and alliances between the FARDC and the FDLR notably during the years of civil war between 1998 and 2003. Now, key players in Kinshasa are divided between doves who favour a negotiated settlement, hawks pushing for an all-out military assault and a third group who view the FDLR as a useful bulwark against regional threats and therefore worth keeping in place.
The FDLR itself, which has no more than 1,500 fighters, is also beset by internal ideological divisions, especially between leader Sylvestre Mudacumura, operational commander Pacifique Ntawuguka and chairman Victor Byiringiro.
So far, the FARDC operation, in the Uvira territory of South Kivu province, appears to have met with little resistance. (Most of the FDLR are based in neighbouring North Kivu). As widely predicted, civilians have left some areas, notably the settlement of Kanyovu, to escape any clashes.
Since the start of the current offensive, MONUSCO has repeatedly tweeted about absence of any abuses such as looting or mistreatment of civilians by FARDC.
And in perhaps another sign of rapprochement, MONUSCO reported on a joint mission by its personnel and government officials to the combat zone to raise awareness about the needs of people displaced by the operation.
Hundreds of thousands of readers trust The New Humanitarian each month for quality journalism that contributes to more effective, accountable, and inclusive ways to improve the lives of people affected by crises.
Our award-winning stories inform policymakers and humanitarians, demand accountability and transparency from those meant to help people in need, and provide a platform for conversation and discussion with and among affected and marginalised people.
We’re able to continue doing this thanks to the support of our donors and readers like you who believe in the power of independent journalism. These contributions help keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Show your support as we build the future of news media by becoming a member of The New Humanitarian.