1. Home
  2. East Africa
  3. Rwanda

Nuns convicted of genocide offences to appeal

Two Rwandan Roman Catholic nuns, convicted in 2001 by a Belgian Crown Court (Cour d'Assises) of participating in the 1994 genocide, have lodged an appeal at the European Court of Human Rights, Reuters reported. Sister Gertrude, named as Consolata Mukangando, and Sister Maria Kizito, named as Julienne Mukabutera, were accused of failing to protect between 5,000 and 7,000 people who had sought sanctuary in their Benedictine convent. Prosecutors said the two Hutu nuns drove local Tutsis - mostly women and children - out of their compound and stood by as militiamen killed them. The nuns - who fled to Belgium in 1994 - were also accused of informing militiamen that some people had fled to nearby buildings. Kizito was also accused of providing jerry cans of gasoline used to set a garage containing 500 people on fire. The nuns were sentenced to 15 and 12 years' imprisonment respectively without right of appeal. Only the Cour de Cassation (the highest court of appeal) would have been authorised to review legal technicalities of the case, but not the facts, if a request had been made within 15 days. "They believe they did not get a fair trial," a lawyer representing Kizito told Reuters. He said the appeal would centre on key witnesses and the chief accuser, Emmanuel Rekeraho, head of the extremist militia in Sovu, southern Rwanda, where the crimes had been committed, who could not testify at the nuns' trial as he had already been imprisoned in Rwanda. "We were never able to question him," the lawyer said. Defence lawyers at the trial expressed doubt over a foreign jury's ability to understand the complexities of the 1994 genocide, while lawyers for the victims said the involvement of a people's jury "avoided transforming the trial into a political debate". "It was not a justice of revenge, but a justice aimed at paving the way to reconciliation in Rwanda." one lawyer commented at the time. The Rwandan genocide survivors' association, Ibuka, also expressed satisfaction with the trial. It described the sentences as a "victory against impunity". The ground-breaking trial was the first in which a country has judged war crimes and human rights violations committed by foreigners on foreign soil.

This article was produced by IRIN News while it was part of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Please send queries on copyright or liability to the UN. For more information: https://shop.un.org/rights-permissions

Share this article

Get the day’s top headlines in your inbox every morning

Starting at just $5 a month, you can become a member of The New Humanitarian and receive our premium newsletter, DAWNS Digest.

DAWNS Digest has been the trusted essential morning read for global aid and foreign policy professionals for more than 10 years.

Government, media, global governance organisations, NGOs, academics, and more subscribe to DAWNS to receive the day’s top global headlines of news and analysis in their inboxes every weekday morning.

It’s the perfect way to start your day.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian today and you’ll automatically be subscribed to DAWNS Digest – free of charge.

Become a member of The New Humanitarian

Support our journalism and become more involved in our community. Help us deliver informative, accessible, independent journalism that you can trust and provides accountability to the millions of people affected by crises worldwide.

Join